MrSmelly1977
·Thank you all for the helpful advice.
The listing which one of the above posters shared is indeed the same one. Indeed, it is remarkable that the hands were conveniently placed over the spelling error!
I can completely understand that some of you cannot believe that I made such a basic mistake. However, remember that the so called low quality of the general redial is not that obvious to anyone new to the vintage watch world.
I think a decent option may be to contact the seller and request a refund based on undisclosed and misspelled redial.
Alternatively a service and decent redial could be ok.
I should probably also mention that he already had to issue a £50 partial refund as the hands can only be set counterclockwise!!!!
Obviously I should have simply returned it straight away when I noticed that.
Perhaps I should be embarrassed to admit such mistakes in an Omega forum but I don’t care as I am new to all this and if you can help that’s great .
We live and learn
The listing which one of the above posters shared is indeed the same one. Indeed, it is remarkable that the hands were conveniently placed over the spelling error!
I can completely understand that some of you cannot believe that I made such a basic mistake. However, remember that the so called low quality of the general redial is not that obvious to anyone new to the vintage watch world.
I think a decent option may be to contact the seller and request a refund based on undisclosed and misspelled redial.
Alternatively a service and decent redial could be ok.
I should probably also mention that he already had to issue a £50 partial refund as the hands can only be set counterclockwise!!!!
Obviously I should have simply returned it straight away when I noticed that.
Perhaps I should be embarrassed to admit such mistakes in an Omega forum but I don’t care as I am new to all this and if you can help that’s great .
We live and learn