Omega Constellation 168.017: Correct Hands? Please help

Hello dear OF!

I am considering purchasing a Ref. 168.017 and I am just a bit unsure about the baton style hands.

This reference often had such hands but as far as I am concerned a bit thinner. Do you thing they are correct for the reference?

Thanks so much!

Yes, for these dials, thicker baton hands are the correct hands

I personally like them the least though, sadly there is no dauphine hands usage I've seen for lumed thick indice models, non-lumed versions regularly has dauphine hands with black centers

Some dial / color combinations also don't regularly come without lume, this is not one of them though, if you don't like it, you can always go for non-lume + dauphine combo