Omega Constellation 168.005 Dial: Original or Redial?

Posts

143

Likes

147

chrisinohio

·Jun 23, 2026

The vast majority of these 168.005s I've seen look like they were made a week ago. Is it just a characteristic of this particular dial that it ages so well or is this an impossibly good redial?

I guess I'm just becoming paranoid in my old age.

I know some of my old Omega friends from many moons ago are on here now, so I await their input.

TIA

Chris

 

Posts

192

Likes

246

dootcho

·Jun 26, 2026

Is the picture above taken directly in front of the watch?

The 6 o'clock mark does not seem to align to the index (so do 4, 2 & 1 o'clock)

 

Posts

143

Likes

147

chrisinohio

·Jun 26, 2026

It appears to be taken directly from the front, but it may be off ever so slightly. Yes, I noticed that too. It was the initial reason I questioned its originality.

 

Posts

3,384

Likes

7,514

SOG53

·Jun 26, 2026

Swiss Made is not centered around 6 marker.
Text appears thick and minute markers a bit far off pie pan line.
See comparison note thin delicate text

 

Posts

143

Likes

147

chrisinohio

·Jun 26, 2026

SOG53

Swiss Made is not centered around 6 marker.
Text appears thick and minute markers a bit far off pie pan line.
See comparison note thin delicate text

Thank you for this. I'm more and more leaning towards it being a very good redial, but missing some of the finer details.

 

Posts

3,384

Likes

7,514

SOG53

·Jun 26, 2026

Viewing them together is often helpful

 

Posts

78

Likes

51

hugh162

·Jun 26, 2026

The date wheel looks to be in very poor condition compared to the dial, so something is definitely up.

 

Posts

143

Likes

147

chrisinohio

·Jun 27, 2026

I had pretty much made up my mind on this example, but I really appreciate all of the opinions confirming my initial thoughts. I'm gonna continue looking for one that's closer to home and doesn't have red flags. Thanks to all who chimed in.

Edited: Jul 1, 2026