oddboy
·yes, mine is 751
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I'll weight it up tonight or tomorrow.
..If you like, i'd be happy to trade my sparkle for your Globemaster to help you with that pain! 😀
It says Chronometer so it should be 168.023 with cal. 751. The non-Chronometer is 166.028.
Now I'm really confused. Is the non-Chrono a 166.023 or a 166.028? I read somewhere that Omega did certify some 752s so that would make 166.023 with a 752 chronometer grade and possibly quite rare.
166.032 is cal 752 non chronometer
Gents, auto, water resistant, calendar
168.023 is cal 751 chronometer.
Gents, auto, water resistant, chronometer, calendar
the caseback are double stamped
http://www.omega-fanatic.com/pages/gallery/omega-codes-and-movement-numbers-1254.php
I tried one on the other day. holy cow is it nice.
Something you don't get to see so often is the rear of a dial, so I think it's time to correct that. Here is what you can expect to find on the back of a '69 Seamaster sparkle dial:-
![]()
and the front of the dial???? Well you will have to wait and see. All good things come to those who wait, or since the work is being done by some very dedicated folks in Germany Was lange währt, wird endlich gut.
😀
In exchange for the pretty pictures above I would like to ask for your opinion about a couple of points:-
1: The dial is being re-lumed. I don't know yet if the Lume that Omega will use will be just cosmetic, i.e. non-luminous or actually luminous. The old Tritium dots were quite dead, far from illuminating and partially missing so some rework was necessary. If the dots are non-luminous there should be no significant change to the dial visual appearance, but, and here is the point where I would like your opinion, if the dots are luminous they will almost certainly NOT be Tritium, so is it valid to still use the "-T SWISS MADE T-" text, or should it be reduced to just SWISS MADE which would be technically correct (I guess).
Looks like the hour indices have been removed, probably to refinish the whole dial. .
Thanks for the "heads up" on the removed indices @TNTwatch. Since I'm neither a watch repairer, not particularly knowledgeable on the subject of dial restorations I dug a bit deeper and had some interesting exchanges with Omega, who have come up with a very cool solution. They have found an exact replacement NOS gold sparkle dial that was stored for over 40 years, which means it has a small amount of age-related patina, but in all other respects is perfect/untouched.
Out of curiosity I asked for a photo of the rear of this replacement dial and Omega duly obliged, the difference is obvious and striking.
I'm really looking forward to seeing my "old" Seamaster. I think Omega have really gone out of their way to find an optimum solution for the restoration of this watch and it's certainly proving to be an interesting learning experience for me and hopefully anyone else that stumbles across this thread.
Do you have front pictures of the two of them side by side?
Yes, but the picture of the re-worked dial front face has too many mistakes which have now been resolved by the NOS dial, so that is one part of the story that will forever remain buried. I suspect there were some very "interesting" exchanges between Omega and their dial restorer after I flagged up the errors.