Omega cased in Europe

Posts
195
Likes
66
As I continue learning more about vintage Omega watches, I took a closer look at one I bought some time ago and noticed the inside caseback markings. From what I understand, these markings suggest the watch was manufactured and cased in Switzerland rather than the U.S., since it doesn’t appear to have a case made by one of the American companies that Omega sometimes used for the U.S. market.
I’m curious what the group thinks—does a Swiss-cased example tend to be viewed as more desirable or valuable compared to U.S.-cased versions, or does it not really make much difference? Always interested in hearing the perspectives of those with more experience collecting vintage Omegas.

Artis

 
Posts
6,245
Likes
9,638
As Omega is a Swiss brand Swiss-cased watches are always going to be preferred to locally cased watches.

This doesn't meant to say that locally cased watches are necessarily of lesser quality e.g. French and British gold-cased Omegas are of equal quality to their Swiss counterparts.

In the case of US watches you also have to take into account that the. movement may also have a lower jewel count - this, like the locally gold-cased watches, was all about import tax.

However, again in the case of US cased watches, you also have to consider the array of rather splendid 'special' dials produced in the US, which are collectible.

So, some swings, some roundabouts.
 
Posts
195
Likes
66
Same watch and I believe that there's radium on the dial. When I checked it with a Geiger counter the reading went up to about 0.7 µSv/h, which seems consistent with radium lume. I also noticed some spotting on the dial that might be radium burn, although I’m not certain.
At this point I’m not planning to restore the dial, but I’m curious what others think. Does this look like typical aging from radium, and more importantly, does the dial appear original to you all? I’d appreciate hearing the opinions of those with more experience with these early Omega dials..

 
Posts
24,045
Likes
53,534
It should definitely be radium from that era. The Geiger reading is probably above background, but quite low for a radium dial, so it's not very hot. I'm not seeing any reason for concern about originality of the dial and personally I would leave it alone.

The sweep hand is not original or even Omega, IMO. Wrong shape, wrong length. That is the glaring issue jumping out at me, but fortunately not too hard to address.
 
Posts
195
Likes
66
It should definitely be radium from that era. The Geiger reading is probably above background, but quite low for a radium dial, so it's not very hot. I'm not seeing any reason for concern about originality of the dial and personally I would leave it alone.

The sweep hand is not original or even Omega, IMO. Wrong shape, wrong length. That is the glaring issue jumping out at me, but fortunately not too hard to address.
Thank you, Dan. Yes, I thought that the sweeping hand looked weird because its a modern black and too long. Thank you for pointing that out. And I guess that's a pretty easy fix. I guess I would have to look at some old pictures to ses what is the most common sweep hand of that era.. If you know of any, let me know. I would obviously take this to a watchmaker.I'm not comfortable working with radium.
 
Posts
24,045
Likes
53,534
Take a look at some of the watches in this thread, the sweep hands are tapered.


and here is the OVD page: https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-seamaster-omega-ko-2767