Omega caliber 361.

Posts
882
Likes
574
Hopefully someone here will help with this Omega caliber 361 that I have. It looks to be in great condition for its age. The movement looks new. I think the crown is a replacement but not 100% sure. Any help would be appreciated. As stated it's a caliber 361. Case reference is 2547-2 . Not sure what the 5027 stands for. Also not sure who l&k were from. Watch dates from 1947. Is it classed as a dogleg watch or something else. Thanks to OF for the space.
 
Posts
28,052
Likes
71,624
Dial appears to be reprinted, and not very well...
 
Posts
882
Likes
574
Looking at the dial it seems to me to be opalescent. I would assume that if someone was going to repaint the dial there are many easier ways to do it than this. Thanks for your input.
 
Posts
376
Likes
1,203
The crown look like a replacement because the watch looks rose gold and the crown it's yellow.
 
Posts
864
Likes
1,533
Is the hour hand a different style from the minute hand?
The G is omega looks wrong.
The only lume on dial is the 12, I would think there should be more.
The indicators, I have not seen before
 
Posts
882
Likes
574
Agreed about the indicators. But why would someone change these. It would seem to be a major job when you could just leave the originals and repaint the dial. This is why I have asked for opinions. Thanks.
 
Posts
1,561
Likes
12,262
Case and movement look nice but still a redialed watch.
 
Posts
3,232
Likes
12,695
How many original 1940s Omegas with sunburst finish have you seen?
 
Posts
882
Likes
574
I certainly am not an expert, that is why I have asked these questions. Thanks.
 
Posts
864
Likes
1,533
Agreed about the indicators. But why would someone change these. It would seem to be a major job when you could just leave the originals and repaint the dial. This is why I have asked for opinions. Thanks.
It likely had all Arabic lumed numerals, but was water damaged, So the dial was refinished and they stuck on indicators and only redid the 12 or worked around the 12.
In the pic the hour hand has a dauphine bottom end but the minute doesn't. Hard to see on my phone.
 
Posts
9,956
Likes
15,634
The 11.9m serial dates to nearer 1949-50 in my experience.

Deffo a redial. The Omega text isn't right and the Swiss Made text and subdial divisions are a little clumsy. The reason it is so clean for its age is that it isn't actually very old.
Edited:
 
Posts
13,441
Likes
31,613
Dial on OPs watch has embossed figures and would have looked something like these. They were not added nor could they have been removed during refinishing which is why they are so "soft". The dial has been polished to death during the refinishing, note how the sub-dial has nearly been obliterated. "12" is simply a bad attempt a recreating the original mirror finish numerals, again see below for examples.

Edited: