Omega 198.0055 - Hard metal hummer

Posts
883
Likes
2,178
This is my first venture out of the Universal Geneve sub-forum so please bear with me; I'm interested in people's opinions on a watch that I bought a couple of years ago. One member here, Tom Dick, assisted me when I bought it and I've been meaning to write something since; I spend far more time on TZ-UK than is probably good for me and the acquisition coincided with an ongoing saga about a particular Omega prototype and this put me off at the time.

This is the watch:
17072015.jpg
23052015.jpg
L1290379.jpg
L1290381.jpg
13.JPG
12.JPG
L1290382.jpg

In my enthusiasm I sent off to Omega for an Extract however this wasn't as helpful as I had hoped; my understanding is that the extract is for the watch that was pulled off the production line to provide the innards for this watch. The case reference and case metal is obviously nothing to do with this watch.

Covering%20letter.jpg
Extract.jpg

There is already one thread in existence and this was created by Paul from Electric Watches; Paul completed the service for me.
http://www.thewatchforum.co.uk/index.php?/topic/95561-omega-f300-hard-metal-mystery/
I also found this thread about a Tissot in the same case (interestingly a second example of the Tissot came up for sale on TZ-UK recently).
https://omegaforums.net/threads/uber-cool-tissot-omega-hard-metal-prototype.36722/#post-419864

In the interests of full disclosure the mesh bracelet is after-market however the clasp is from a Ploprof.
 
Posts
2,336
Likes
6,706
It's a cool watch. I have a f300 with the same movement but different case. It can be regulated to within about 15 second/month accuracy.
No idea about the "hard metal" alloy (sorry). What makes you think it isn't stainless steel? It's not too obvious from the pictures...
 
Posts
17,746
Likes
26,930
Looks like tugstun to me. Different luster also on the skywalker and Vader seamasters also.
 
Posts
883
Likes
2,178
What makes you think it isn't stainless steel? It's not too obvious from the pictures...

Tom Dick says it is and that's sort of good enough for me 😀. As far as I can see it's exactly the same case as the Tissot. It definitely does have a different lustre to stainless; sort of a smokey bluey-grey. It's very difficult to photograph.
 
Posts
17,746
Likes
26,930
Just out of curiosity is the model number on the case back for that watch or also a donor?
 
Posts
9,932
Likes
15,601
That clearly is a rare and interesting watch, I would hesitate to suggest that it is a prototype since a search on the case number gets hits on Boley, Cousins etc which may suggest full production to some extent and that case no seems to have been used on a megaquartz also if a Google fragment I found is to be believed. I think that extract does you no favours and isn't much help as it could suggest that while the case could still be special, it has suffered a movement swap at some point. Of course it could just be as you suggest, built with a movement destined for something else. It is certainly a nice piece though. I would note that the 1972 date on a 32.8m serial sound odd to me, I would have expected that serial on a 1970 piece so perhaps it is a factory trial piece of some kind.
Edited:
 
Posts
883
Likes
2,178
Just out of curiosity is the model number on the case back for that watch or also a donor?
Good question. The watch does appear to have a sapphire crystal which matches with the entry found in the Omega Dressings Catalogue for 198.0055; something I understand to be unusual for a f.300. I have no reason to believe that it's from a donor but I'm obviously interested in views here.
 
Posts
2,336
Likes
6,706
Tom Dick says it is and that's sort of good enough for me 😀. As far as I can see it's exactly the same case as the Tissot. It definitely does have a different lustre to stainless; sort of a smokey bluey-grey. It's very difficult to photograph.
Fair enough. Do you think the metal seen is a coating, or the case was milled from the "hard metal"?

Looks like tugstun to me. Different luster also on the skywalker and Vader seamasters also.

I have a large block of pure tungsten (a bob of a fancy pendulum clock). It is grey in colour, no blue tint at all. Also pure tungsten is notoriously difficult to machine as it is very brittle.and also abrasive on tools.