- Posts
- 118
- Likes
- 333
Karusel
·
The Rolex release was on midnight Swiss time which equated to 6pm EDT (made for an interesting commute back from work). I'm not sure if Omega would do something similar but considering other markets, why not?
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I personally prefer LE ;
3. doing very little snail change means you are going to see your designers (of movements) not staying / leaving and not attracting new designers. Can you imagine being told by your organisation not to innovate but do minute improvement each year (they cant learn, they will be bored to death, and their annual performance appraisal cannot be good). how can this be good forever?
So many people whine about how Omega overwhelms us with too many limited editions, specifically in regard to the Speedmaster Professional.
https://www.rolex.com/watches/cosmograph-daytona/all-models.html#p=1
I count 47 SKUs.
The A8 is probably made in batches, shipped, sales monitored and then if demand remains good a further batch is made and so on. The manager at my OB told me that Omega has invested a lot of money in the tools to do this type of work so he didn't see an end to production anytime soon. The Alinghi version would use the same equipment so maybe this explains why the A8 has been out of stock for a few months, focus has been on the new model, now that the Alinghi is out production can restart on the A8.
Just a few thoughts before the coffee kicks in.
I am convinced they do not introduce LEs for the sake of keeping their design department happy. It is getting more and more a repetition of moves. A re-edition of commemorative watch, do I need to say more.
What I am saying here is that the LE strategy is a very thin line. People out of the OF and Speedmaster LE community are starting to get a bit fed up with these new LEs. They should only introduce new watches or LE's when they are well thought and perfectly executed, the product and consumers should be the main focus. Not their own organization or to keep the shareholders happy with a nice profit made by "OMG what should be do next for this year LE?"
Why has the OG Speedmaster been such a succes? Because it is a robust watch tested by NASA, and a great example of less is more. IMHO due to all of these LEs the Speedmaster Professional gets less appreciation cause these LEs district attention and appreciation for the OG Speedmaster. I am not saying they should not do a LE once in a while, but they should make it only if it is really exceptional and long lasting and way less frequent. Focus on what is important and what is the core.
Would not mind if Omega would make nice SKUs that would be non LE. Why doesn't Omega have nice white gold or platinum speedmaster in stock? Why not a white dial? Why not a panda dial etc. Why not one with a ceramic bezel? But please quit with making butt ugly LEs like they have done before.
I am convinced they do not introduce LEs for the sake of keeping their design department happy. It is getting more and more a repetition of moves. A re-edition of commemorative watch, do I need to say more.
What I am saying here is that the LE strategy is a very thin line. People out of the OF and Speedmaster LE community are starting to get a bit fed up with these new LEs. They should only introduce new watches or LE's when they are well thought and perfectly executed, the product and consumers should be the main focus. Not their own organization or to keep the shareholders happy with a nice profit made by "OMG what should be do next for this year LE?"
Why has the OG Speedmaster been such a succes? Because it is a robust watch tested by NASA, and a great example of less is more. IMHO due to all of these LEs the Speedmaster Professional gets less appreciation cause these LEs district attention and appreciation for the OG Speedmaster. I am not saying they should not do a LE once in a while, but they should make it only if it is really exceptional and long lasting and way less frequent. Focus on what is important and what is the core.
I hope the new Snoopy will be a fixed limited edition, because I just cannot picture Omega having a mass produced watch with a character that is not their intellectual property. So far all limited production watches have been on properties that belong to Omega, FOIS, Apollo 8.
There is a good argument for making LE's exactly that Limited Editions, price them accordingly and make those who buy them feel as though they are getting something special. So in this case what if the watch was made up of 500 pieces, in white gold with a snoopy tribute on the dial and rear case, priced at £27,500GBP, there's nothing else available. If you have the funds and buy one you are getting a very exclusive watch, a genuine limited edition.
How would this go down?
That’s a great point that I hadn’t considered. The deal with the Shultz estate or whoever are the copyright holders would surely have stated # of pieces in the contract or scope of usage.
Would not mind if Omega would make nice SKUs that would be non LE. Why doesn't Omega have nice white gold or platinum speedmaster in stock? Why not a white dial? Why not a panda dial etc. Why not one with a ceramic bezel? But please quit with making butt ugly LEs like they have done before.
Are people talking about not liking LEs in a thread about a LE about to be released.
The Speedmaster LE train is a all stops ride. ST1, ST2, R.A.I.D, Met, Snoopy, some yacht, a car, a moon landing 50 years ago, the ratatouille Italian tablecloth one, Japanese galaxy express . Hell there is a suitcase in a thread with friggen 23 LEs in it that don’t include the 10 or so above.
If they make them interesting they can put out as many LEs as they like.
I for one love the idea of many LEs year in year out, makes collecting interesting.
The length of this thread alone shows LEs create interest within the collecting community.