YY77
·Here's another take on the whole partial and full deposits requirement/fiasco:
Omega may have learned from the A11 50th from last year where most outside of the US were not required to place any or only a small deposit. This lead to many on the list being multiple listing and/or opportunists. The multiple listing lead to opportunists getting one or more watches ahead of the customers that really wanted them for personal use. Forums only represent a small portion of watch owners out there and I'm sure customers who missed out feed back their disappointment to the OBs and ADs.
So with the Snoopy 3 Omega want increase the chances of the early batch of watches ending up in the hands of customers who really want it for personal enjoyment (not the opportunists). So they're asking for full deposits in an attempt to achieve this. Full deposits means less multiple queueing from individuals since there is an up front capital outlay. It also requires a serious commitment from a customer upfront so short term flippers may not want to gamble the capital for that duration of time.
I would argue that the deposit scheme has merit for the people who really want the watch for themselves.
Although is a difference with watches as the contract for a car between customer and dealer is binding (cancellation fee of 15%). I would assume Omega does wants to achieve equal distribution of a watch like the Snoopy 3.
So distribution based on whether a full deposit is placed wouldn't be reasonable if the store only requires a partial deposit or isn't allowed (UK?) to ask for a deposit as it will be a contractual agreement to deliver when they aren't sure they can.