Agreed. Personally, I'd rather have a 3861 over a 321, due to technological advancements. I prefer hacking seconds + magnetic resistance features of the 3861, over the column wheel action of a 321.
Working in a field where I usually take 2 commercial flights a week, and occasionally go near medical imaging equipment on the job, I've experienced frequent magnetic interruptions to the timekeeping accuracy of watches in my collection like Speedmasters and a Reverso. I wouldn't pay a price premium for a 321. I would much rather have 3861-powered Speedmaster, even if it was priced the same as a 321. Anecdotally, the technician at the Beverly Center OB told me during a chat 2-3 years back, that the most common model that customers bring in for demagnetizing, are Speedmasters.
Mentions of GO and Breguet in early posts has me also thinking twice about the price proposition of the Snoopy. While I think a valid case can be made for the Snoopy's 9,600 USD MSRP (carbon ceramic bezel, 3861, silver dial, caseback), 10k is approaching GO complications and entry-level Breguet. "Speedmaster" is not an easy answer to default to, when your other options include a discounted Type XX Transatlantique or previous-gen Marine Big Date for the same price. Looking outside the Swatch group, we also find a Submariner and GMT at lower MSRP than the Snoopy.
Click to expand...