Community Stories

NOS 1972 Seamaster Cosmic 2000 - All insight welcome!

M
Posts
7
Likes
5
I recently came across this NOS 1972 Seamaster Cosmic 2000 and immediately knew I had to have it. The watch was purchased new and held in a security deposit box for its entire life. The original owners son was selling it as part of his father’s estate. He had it opened and the seal replaced at a reputable local watch repair facility right before I acquired the piece.

I do not know much about this reference aside from the fact that it has the cal. 1022 and an integrated bracelet.

Any fun facts or comments are welcomed!

IMG_3845.webp IMG_3846.webp IMG_3821.webp IMG_3819.webp IMG_3820.webp IMG_3817.webp IMG_3814.webp IMG_3822.webp IMG_3843.webp
 
Davidt
Posts
11,469
Likes
20,087
Very 70’s with a novel way of sealing the case together.
I’d say it’s mint rather than NOS though unless you have the tags, papers, boxes etc.
 
Pvt-Public
Posts
2,492
Likes
3,506
M mvttryvn
The watch was purchased new and held in a security deposit box for its entire life.
So really it is “used hardly worn” That being said it is a good looking watch in excellent condition.
 
Pvt-Public
Posts
2,492
Likes
3,506
Davidt Davidt
Very 70’s with a novel way of sealing the case together.
I’d say it’s mint rather than NOS though unless you have the tags, papers, boxes etc.
Even with the tags, papers and boxes it’s still a used watch.
 
ketiljo
Posts
355
Likes
932
Not sure if it's a fun fact, but this one shares the bracelet and outer casing with the Seamaster f300hz, 198.0044
image.webp

I have had a few of these. But I couldn't get around that the hands are way too short and don't reach the minute markers
 
M
Posts
7
Likes
5
Davidt Davidt
Very 70’s with a novel way of sealing the case together.
I’d say it’s mint rather than NOS though unless you have the tags, papers, boxes etc.
Correct, unworn/mint condition.
 
M
Posts
7
Likes
5
Pvt-Public Pvt-Public
So really it is “used hardly worn” That being said it is a good looking watch in excellent condition.
Yes, that would be most accurate
 
M
Posts
7
Likes
5
ketiljo ketiljo
Not sure if it's a fun fact, but this one shares the bracelet and outer casing with the Seamaster f300hz, 198.0044
image.webp

I have had a few of these. But I couldn't get around that the hands are way too short and don't reach the minute markers
Certainly is a fun fact! The hands would irritate me as well
 
M
Posts
7
Likes
5
Davidt Davidt
Very 70’s with a novel way of sealing the case together.
I’d say it’s mint rather than NOS though unless you have the tags, papers, boxes etc.
Fully agree, poor choice in language on my part
 
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

D

Seamaster Cosmic 2000 Ref. 166-0128 - Crown Help

droptinetrader Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
D
droptinetrader
Posts
9
Views
3K
jinkster

Advice please on an Omega seamaster cosmic 2000 automatic

jinkster Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
wilderbeast
wilderbeast
Posts
8
Views
1K
lenndon

Need Help with my Seamaster Cosmic 2000 ref. 166.131

lenndon Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
lenndon
lenndon
Posts
3
Views
3K
M

Omega Seamaster Cosmic 2000…Authentic?

Mkenn17 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Olhenry56
Olhenry56
Posts
2
Views
2K
M

1972 Seamaster

mark corrigan Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Jerseyhammer
Jerseyhammer
Posts
33
Views
4K
Toishome

Omega Seamaster Cosmic 2000 Ref: 166.133, Serviced ***$295***

Toishome Private Watch Sales
Toishome
Toishome
Posts
0
Views
4K