Forums Latest Members
  1. Winton Dupree Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    0
    Hi everyone,

    I have a cal 552 movement, in a frontloader 14765 61 sc case. I've had this for a couple of years, always assumed it was a redial with changed hands. As for the price, well, it was worth picking up even if everything else (which I suspect) is totally wrong. Most likely a franken watch.

    However on the .0001% chance this is a holy grail watch, I respectfully would like to ask for the forums expertise on this watch. I believe it is a redial, possibly from a constallation due to indices and hands. The crystal does have the Omega logo, and both the movement and case seem to match up. Serial number starts with 18 which is likely a 61 (roughly). There is oily sheen patina on the dial which I was unable to photograph which is very similar to the one found here: https://omegaforums.net/attachments/connieoil-jpg.149359/

    Unfortunately, I am unable to open the frontloader case, so the case and movement picture are quick cell shots from a while ago, bad focus, and unfortunately, no serial on the movement as the pictures did not come out.. Although I have seen them and they do match up. My apologies in advance as I do not want to waste anyone's time. Any advice on what the dial, hands and crown are would be very much appreciated, as if I do sell this watch, I would not want to mislead anyone.

    Thanks in advance.
     
    20180106_084925.jpg 20180106_084951.jpg 20180107_073114.jpg 20180107_073158.jpg 20180107_073544.jpg 20180107_073710.jpg 20170321_122042.jpg 20170321_122029.jpg
  2. Winton Dupree Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    0
    Slightly better picture of Movement.
     
    20170321_123152.jpg
  3. dan7800 Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    803
    Likes
    811
    I believe that is a 552 movement? - A bit hard to read

    This thread may be a bit helpful

    https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-seamaster-cal-552-1960.670/


    Hard for me to comment on the dial, but my guess is that the movement is legit, but I have suspicions about the dial (any black dial that looks too good usually is)--- but I might be wrong about the dial.
     
  4. Winton Dupree Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    0
    Hi Dan, it is a 552 Movement, I can confirm that. My apologies for the horrible old cell phone pics.
     
  5. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    16,355
    Likes
    44,937
    It's probably a old white or starburst dial painted black

    What is the number inside the case ( Google that number as it is the model )

    Bingo this looks like the case

    image.jpeg
     
  6. Winton Dupree Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    0
    Hi Standy, the number inside the case is 14765 61 sc. I'm pretty confident the case, crystal and movement are legit. Thanks for the response.
     
  7. watch3s Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    1,363
    Likes
    821
    sat968 likes this.
  8. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    Don't all frontloader cases look the same?
     
  9. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
  10. fjf Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    766
    Likes
    743
    If that's a redial it is a damn good one!.
     
    bubba48 likes this.
  11. Buck2466 Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    1,174
    Likes
    7,584
    Aren't all redials bad?::stirthepot::
     
  12. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    Welcome to the forum Winton, Glad you took my advice and asked here. I can only echo the previous reply, if it's a redial it's a damn good one.
     
  13. ConElPueblo Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    The hands are wrong, but I can't see anything obviously wrong with the dial...
     
  14. François Pépin Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    1,531
    Likes
    1,081
    Every good looking black dial is not a redial! Well, assuming in the first place it probably is is still a good idea...
     
  15. Winton Dupree Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    0
    Thanks for your help everyone, it is very much appreciated. I always had a thought that this could be real, simply because I couldn't find anything wrong with it, but am aware how rare a black dial with crosshairs is. I suspect that this watch was never used much, and due to the monocoque case, rarely opened, if ever.

    Does anyone have any idea what kind of hands these are? I also found the indices different than most seamasters, could there be a correlation?
     
  16. Winton Dupree Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    0

    Thanks fir the advice, very much appreciated.
     
  17. gdupree Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    902
    Likes
    1,560
    Same. I don't see anything obviously wrong.

    Also, It would appear we share a last name, good sir.
     
  18. ConElPueblo Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    If you do a search on Google Images on the ref. no. you'll find an identical Seamaster sold on WUS some time ago - but with a silver dial. When you're doing the search, have a look at the hands of all other examples of the ref - yours is the only with those hands. Could be a special order, but I highly doubt that.

    The swapped hands are odd, though. Why change them in the first place?
     
  19. Gstp Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    468
    Likes
    1,928
    I think the hands are correct. I've had these on same model at least two times in my collection. But of course they may been replacements too.....
     
    Edited Jan 7, 2018
    ConElPueblo likes this.
  20. ConElPueblo Jan 7, 2018

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    That sort of experience counts for something..!