Nivada Grenchen Antarctic Thoughts

Posts
2
Likes
1
Probably stupid newbie question, but: I've recently discovered a Nivada Antarctic I'm very much tempted to buy, I think it's a really, really nice watch.
However, I found that a quite similar watch was sold a few years back, and that if these are indeed the same watch, the dial must've been extensively reworked.

So here's my question: would an early 60s Nivada Antarctic have a serial number on the back side, or are these numbers and letters like a watch type or model indication? Unless I'm misreading, the inscription is 8852M2107 on both images/watches.

The Antarctic automatic (I mean issued as Nivada, not Croton Nivada) has model number 2107 for the date version and 2105 without the date. From its first edition (around 1958) to the mid sixties, the model number stayed the same, but cases, casebacks and dials varied).
 
Posts
1
Likes
1
Can anyone help with this? I recently acquired a Nivada Grenchen watch with a dial on it that I can't seem to find another one to compare with. The back has a serial number of 61L47251 can anyone tell me if this is a rare dial or valued more than another that says Antarctic vs the 25 Jewels wording? Does this make it more valuable? The watch ticks and works beautifully.

 
Posts
6
Likes
8
Rarer, but not necessarily more valuable. The watch is most likely early—pre-Aug 1956, when “Antarctic” began appearing on the dial a few months after ODF I. Some of the early watches were dial marked 25j, as were some later ones after Antarctic was on the dial.
 
Posts
47
Likes
101
I just rummaged through my archives and came up with three I've picked up in the last few months.
I two tone COCS with a mirrored outer ring in a stainless case.
A gold plated Antarctic also with a mirrored ring with minute markers printed on it. The dial is a pale satin gold finish too.
And my new favorite, an Aquamatic, not Antarctic though with what I think is a Butler Finish, When the dial is rocked and light hits it, the quadrants switch back and forth from dark to light. I've also found a Tissot with the old script logo, that's got the same finish, no crosshairs, as it's on a 45º. I suspect there's a fine grain finish that reflects light differently from different angles. I have a pic of an Omega Seamaster with it too, and it was the very first display case back. The case back was pretty rudimentary and kind of awful.

 
Posts
47
Likes
101
The first Antarctic models were based off an Aquamatic with the deco indices and they simply removed the Aquamatic callout. There's no date and date models. Here's mine. Seeing 25 Jewels on this is interesting. That's the peak variant of the ETA 1256 and I thought it was a later upgrade. One watchmaker commented on servicing one and how impressed by it he was compared to 17 and 21 jeweled versions. I saved a screen shot of his comment that included more info but I can't find it. I almost bought an 25 jewel count version just because, but have enough for one lifetime.

 
Posts
31
Likes
41
The first Antarctic models were based off an Aquamatic with the deco indices and they simply removed the Aquamatic callout. There's no date and date models. Here's mine. Seeing 25 Jewels on this is interesting. That's the peak variant of the ETA 1256 and I thought it was a later upgrade. One watchmaker commented on servicing one and how impressed by it he was compared to 17 and 21 jeweled versions. I saved a screen shot of his comment that included more info but I can't find it. I almost bought an 25 jewel count version just because, but have enough for one lifetime.

Really nice additions.
I'll keep my eyes out for the 25j version. 👍