news from Jose (Perezkope)

Posts
6,210
Likes
25,894
Thanks!
Although I was expecting more information on the claims he made. Is that spelled out somewhere?
I’ve noticed he sometimes shares little glimpses like this to his Instagram “stories” while he’s still writing a full length article for his website. That’s not always the case as sometimes he publishes these to Instagram to tag the auction houses and get the info out there; but, a detailed article may be on the horizon.
 
Posts
374
Likes
447
IMG-20240422-063245-369.jpg
IMG-20240422-063247-931.jpg
 
Posts
2,870
Likes
14,703
After Davide Parmegiani (ie. dax2499) posted this refutation of Perezscope's original expose, it still leaves several unaswered questions:

1. Was it then disclosed at auction that
a) Dial in print catalogue was fake?
b) the watch presented at auction had correct dial swapped in, but was essentially now a franken?
2. Doesn't the weird country code of '909' on the papers (which is suspect as in the original expose) need some explanation from the auctioneers and Davide P?