Community Stories

New Speedmaster 57 Broad Arrow vs. Zenith El Primero Striking 10th?

sarir97
Posts
113
Likes
233
I need help with my next purchase. Both are beautiful chronographs. Which would you pick and why? The Omega will give me no trouble, with longer servicing intervals. The Zenith's ability to time to nearest 1/10 of a second is just awesome (forget that my finger's reaction time makes this function useless for practical purposes). My concern is the 36000 vph and the more frequent servicing interval.

Here's a picture of the Zenith if it helps. 6892926f15e2c15088098b695f795421.jpg
 
sarir97
Posts
113
Likes
233
I should add that the Zenith is a limited edition! Only 1969 made.
 
Nobel Prize
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
Both are amazing, I have a zenith and it is not high maintenance, that said I would hesitate at buying on the chromo properties alone because, really, who really uses a non digital chromo when it counts.

Between them I would get the zenith, if you where thinking a truly vintage speedier then I would hesitate but the modern 57 is a bit gimmicky while the zenith is not.
 
alam
Posts
8,123
Likes
19,011
🍿 what's the difference wrt their respective OEM's recommended service intervals?
 
sarir97
Posts
113
Likes
233
@ Nobel: good advise. I'm leaning towards the Zenith as well. It's not just the chronograph properties, but it sure does stand out from the crowd. I also like the dial and the distinctive red split second hand.

For what it's worth, I already have a vintage 105.012-65 Speedy.

@ alam: I don't know. But I figure the new Co-axial Omegas come with long warranties for a reason. And the fact that the Zenith beats at 36000 vph vs the usual 28000 probably puts additional wear on the unit.
 
Nobel Prize
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
Is the 57 a coaxial? I don't think it is.

Either way if you already have a vintage speedy stay legit and get the Zenith. I am no expert on movement wear but it's not like I see a lot of complaining from zenith owners, including me, on the performance and durability of the primero movement. Quite the opposite.

But at the end of the day for me it's about covering more ground with your collection. I don't think the modern 57 has that much to offer. Great aesthetic , but a little gimmicky like the smp300 master coaxial. Just my opinion.
 
Nobel Prize
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
I actually don't know how much the movement you have evolved from the mid eighties. I'm fairly new to zenith and just fell for the De Luca. Also I like limited editions and there are only about 700 of these
Edited:
 
Nobel Prize
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
sarir97 sarir97
All the modern Omegas are co-axial.
The manual movements are not are they? I'm a little drunk right now so bare with me. I'm guessing the 57 is automatic?
 
ctime3
Posts
967
Likes
1,017
Nobel Prize Nobel Prize
Is the 57 a coaxial? I don't think it is.

Either way if you already have a vintage speedy stay legit and get the Zenith. I am no expert on movement wear but it's not like I see a lot of complaining from zenith owners, including me, on the performance and durability of the primero movement. Quite the opposite.

But at the end of the day for me it's about covering more ground with your collection. I don't think the modern 57 has that much to offer. Great aesthetic , but a little gimmicky like the smp300 master coaxial. Just my opinion.
Yes Sir it is
 
Alex_TA
Posts
533
Likes
754
I'm your guy. I have Speedmaster 9300 with the same movement as in '57 and Zenith Pilot Big Date with El Primero movement.

I love both. Now, I'm not sure that the idea of frequent maintenance of El Primero is correct. In theory, this is true, but life, as we know, is different from the theory.
Although El Primero is not co-axial my Zenith is more accurate then Omega (which is also not bad at all). My Omega is running +3.5 sec/24hrs while Zenith is -1.5 sec. My friend has the Striking, it is fantastically accurate. But 9300 is almost insensitive if the chronograph is running or not. You can run it constantly. Instruction to El Primero does not recommend running chrono all the time.

Pay attention that Striking 10th does not have hours sub dial. One more difference: Omega substantially thicker. In the end, both a great watches. Zenith is smart casual, Omega is more sporty.

English is not my native language, forgive the possible grammatical errors.
 
SeanO
Posts
1,306
Likes
1,456
If you've already got an Omega then go the Zenith simply as a change.

Plus the Zenith is a "limited" edition with a movement that is rightfully lauded as one of the finest ever put into a chrono.

easy choice really...
 
Nobel Prize
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
ctime3 ctime3
Yes Sir it is
Goes to show how little I've paid attention to this watch. And it's a beautiful watch, no question.
 
sarir97
Posts
113
Likes
233
Thanks for the feedback. I've got several votes for the Zenith, which I was leaning towards anyway. I'll try and negotiate a deal with the seller tomorrow. I'll follow-up with a wrist shot if I purchase. 😀
 
sarir97
Posts
113
Likes
233
Watch finally purchased! Couldn't be happier, though somewhat surprised the movement is non-hacking. Looking to dress down the shiny metal bracelet with a leather strap. Any suggestions?
Edited:
 
20 More Posts...
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

Intime

Zenith El Primero Striking 10th Rose Gold

Intime Zenith Watches
versatile
versatile
Posts
6
Views
2K
TheRalphieJ

FS: Zenith El Primero Striking 10th Bracelet and Strap Limited Edition

TheRalphieJ Watches For Sale
TheRalphieJ
TheRalphieJ
Posts
1
Views
3K
Darkhorse

Zenith Chronomaster 2 El Primero Striking 10th

Darkhorse Zenith Watches
P
pongster
Posts
3
Views
2K
kurtj29

Incoming, Zenith El Primero Striking 10th

kurtj29 Zenith Watches
Fattony
Fattony
Posts
6
Views
2K