New Seamaster 300 Master Co-Axial CK2913 Re-Issue Basel 2014

Posts
996
Likes
1,863
^^^^

that would be a ::facepalm1:: of epic proportions.


Thinking it's either that or steel. That matte side really doesn't appear to be ceramic at all.
 
Posts
480
Likes
439
Could this watch be Omega's answer to the Rolex Yacht-Master? The YM takes its diver design cues from the Sub but is intended to be a topside watch; it has a lower WR rating than the Sub (though it uses exactly the same crown design, so it's probably actually just as WR in practice) and a bidirectional solid platinum bezel on a SS case.

Omega might be using the SM300 design as inspiration for a new type of dive-inspired luxury topside watch with all the latest tech (if indeed the case is ceramic).

We'll know soon enough. 馃榾
 
Posts
480
Likes
439
New video confirms the all-stainless version at least, though I'm actually more interested to see what the "special" version ends up being.
 
Posts
194
Likes
127
they know how to tease us, don't they?

So much so that I think I have fallen in love, hated, and fallen in love again with this watch 100 times and it isn't even out yet!
 
Posts
968
Likes
3,609
I hear you...
Right now I am back in love -- PCLS!! definitely looks SS -
I think Shem is onto something with the Yacht-Master role in the Omega Stable...looks a bit more stylish...but not sure how the "patina Dial" will fit...

Either way...Back in love (for now)
 
Posts
6,712
Likes
18,569
that looks an awful lot like a sandwich dial, don't it?
 
Posts
7,775
Likes
35,364
Wow that starts to look seriously cool!

I had been reserving my opinion until now, but after seeing that clip I think it looks like this one is definitely going to be a winner in the looks department.

I worry about the price though and as am not in the habit of taking a direct hit on a watch I doubt it will even make "The List"
 
Posts
2,343
Likes
3,040
that looks an awful lot like a sandwich dial, don't it?

It's certainly looking that way when the light moves across it.
 
Posts
6,712
Likes
18,569
AKA a cutout dial - the dial has design elements cut out of it, and an underdial, usually in a contrasting color, shows through the cutouts. Panerai is the best known of the modern users of cutout dials. They were found in certain watches in the 1930s and 1940s, like this little number I picked up in Melbourne the year before last.

xDSC_0030.jpg
xDSC_0032.jpg
xDSC_0044.jpg
 
Posts
33,160
Likes
37,894
I'd imagine initially it was probably a cost saving measure more than anything, if you can lume the underdial, then stamp out the top dial with a die you don't need to pay someone to paint it. It does however look very cool due to the added dimension it creates.
 
Posts
6,712
Likes
18,569
except most cutout dials I've seen aren't featureless - I'm thinking of the sublime Longines chronographs in Goldberger's book.
 
Posts
618
Likes
996
For a vintage Seamaster addict, this is "THE" modern Omega I've been waiting for, and it does somewhat look as expected for a modern re-issue (given of course the difference in expectations between today's vs 50/60's "Awesome").
Still, am not complaining, but it looks to be missing 2 of the most desireable features of the original Seamaster 300 IMO:
1. That amazing minimalist very narrow bezel in comparison to the rest of the watch
2. That iconic text font which so defines the original first issue of the first generation straight lug divers... missing the sexy "S" and slick "3"

Instead, it looks like the "300" will remain with the 300M modern, round hour marker monsters!
It's sad that this re-issue opportunity was not used to re-define the Seamaster 300 identity back to what it was meant to represent, and "fix" the 200 m vs 300 m [edit] issue they introduced the watch with in '58!
 
Posts
33,160
Likes
37,894
Wasn't it 200m rather than 200ft? I seem to remember there was some situation like the watch actually being safe to full depth but the pressure testing equipment necessary not being available.
 
Posts
618
Likes
996
Wasn't it 200m rather than 200ft? I seem to remember there was some situation like the watch actually being safe to full depth but the pressure testing equipment necessary not being available.
Yup... just edited that 馃榾
 
Posts
33,160
Likes
37,894
There's actually a video somewhere where they explain it, something like they actually tested it to full depth in a lake or something and it passed easily but couldn't be used for official rating purposes
 
Posts
618
Likes
996
Yes, their pressure testing equipment of the time wasn't capable of testing beyond 200m, but the watch performed way beyond their official rating capabilities.
I'd love to see that video, though... haven't come across it before, if anyone could share the link 馃憤