Forums Latest Auctions Members

New Hodinkee Writeup on the X-33

  1. duc

    duc Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    881
    Likes
    4,861
  2. Larry S

    Larry S Color Commentator for the Hyperbole. Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    7,684
    Likes
    29,276
    All these articles / posts of late. I’m starting to want one of these.
     
    321Only and Wivac like this.
  3. Wivac

    Wivac Terribly special Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    1,174
    Likes
    9,346
    I've had one on my list all year and if it wasn't for buying a new chunk of building....
     
  4. duc

    duc Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    881
    Likes
    4,861
    Although I'm not wearing it today, here is a snap, and my commitment to be wearing it tomorrow:

    X33.jpg
     
    larryganz, JohnnyRocket, Yak1 and 2 others like this.
  5. Darlinboy

    Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    7,047
    Likes
    50,897
    While I appreciate the sophisticated capabilities of the X-33, they’d be wasted on me.

    And anyway, I am not sure this new fangled battery/digital technology will catch on.

    Batteries in a watch for goodness sake! :eek:
     
    Wryfox, noelekal, Rman and 6 others like this.
  6. duc

    duc Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    881
    Likes
    4,861
    I almost shot good beer out of my nose while reading this.
     
    Yak1 and Darlinboy like this.
  7. Yak1

    Yak1 Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    105
    Likes
    597
    I had committed to no batteries/charging for my timepieces—however, given my recent interest in the F300’s and the X-33, I’m probably gonna have to walk that back.
     
  8. SpeedyPhill

    SpeedyPhill asked ages ago but no longer interested Oct 9, 2019

    Posts
    2,414
    Likes
    3,613
    Any ideas how the numbers of classic Speedmaster chronographs turn out against the production numbers of X-33 ?
     
  9. padders

    padders Oct 9, 2019

    Posts
    4,672
    Likes
    6,544
    Be aware that you would be lucky to get more than 2-3 years out of a cell on either if you actually use it. It is the short battery life that puts me off the X-33 since it isn't really designed to be user serviceable, what with 9 tiny fiddly screws to lose then there can be issues getting the new cell to work after changing. It may be better on the recent Gen3 X-33, I love the 1665 and 1666 movement Omega models (and still have a Seamaster multifunction 150m) but the battery life is a big drawback IMO. The f300s are even more battery hungry, they can eat a cell 18 months but are far easier to change than with the X-33.
     
    Edited Oct 9, 2019
    SpeedyPhill likes this.
  10. JohnnyRocket

    JohnnyRocket Oct 9, 2019

    Posts
    153
    Likes
    161
    Well now, I think you can look at the ratio of the number of watch Winding
    Sessions in a given week and the associated reset the date /day/ correct time fumble vs. Oh it’s flashing I guess it’s time to go to the Ad ...shoot the shit with sales girl - drink my latte ...and change the battery every 2 yrs.
    Ok. Now- I’d
    admit if you are the type of guy who can’t keep his fingers of the back light button
    That ratio of battery life changes. But I admit I kind of like just slipping my X 33 on
    Going out the door for the weekend and not having to worry about winding the watch sometime in my pending hangover at the ski slopes or the beach. I have at least 4 mechanical watches that I do enjoy a lot. But the reset thing can be a pain
    Depending on the watch. My Explorer 2 is a pain to reset. The Z 33 and X 33 have
    Sleep modes that do save battery life when not worn after a few days. So it really depends what you wear how often and for what.
     
  11. Tubber

    Tubber Oct 10, 2019

    Posts
    1,620
    Likes
    5,850
    I have a Gen 2 X-33 and don't mind the battery change intervals. At least it has an EOL indicator. A battery change and re-seal is £60 from a well respected watchmaker in the UK which I don't find excessive. They make good travel watches and being Titanium they are very light.
     
  12. JohnnyRocket

    JohnnyRocket Oct 10, 2019

    Posts
    153
    Likes
    161
    You really have to love the comfort and the light weight of the titanium. And really handy features
     
  13. JohnnyRocket

    JohnnyRocket Oct 10, 2019

    Posts
    153
    Likes
    161
  14. JohnnyRocket

    JohnnyRocket Oct 10, 2019

    Posts
    153
    Likes
    161
    Yep..You got right where I live. Hahaha...
     
  15. Kringkily

    Kringkily Omega Collector Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    5,303
    Likes
    4,368
    The gen 2 is my favorite. All the upgrades to the gen 1 and great size and weight. The current ones are a bit large for me (small guy :( ...) they all look cool though
     
  16. Tubber

    Tubber Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    1,620
    Likes
    5,850
    Are the current ones much larger than the old Gen 2?
     
  17. JohnnyRocket

    JohnnyRocket Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    153
    Likes
    161
    3FA8C01D-3584-4F79-9F6A-82971239E56A.jpeg The SkyWalker x-33 wears almost identically in size on my wrist. The new Gen 3
    Has of course a much different face and digital display. Very similar in capabilities
    But I find the illumination back light feature is I think muck brighter on the Gen 2.
    The Z-33 on the other hand is a much different horse.
    It’s much larger in case height, but because it’s titanium it’s not that heavy. Plus the red digital is smokin sick. As My son would say. I ‘m lucky to have all the X 33
    In my collection. I mix things up with Z on occasion. It’s my artiste watch...
    When I want to solicit a reaction! A556C92A-7278-48AD-A77F-951BB3058D40.jpeg C841C077-1AD0-40EF-8076-35537D4517FB.jpeg 26BF4BC3-10A3-4946-9BF6-E62AEE717285.jpeg
     
    larryganz likes this.
  18. Kringkily

    Kringkily Omega Collector Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    5,303
    Likes
    4,368
    New ones are 45mm
     
  19. Tubber

    Tubber Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    1,620
    Likes
    5,850
    Would you be kind enough to show a comparison photo of the Z-33 next to a Gen 2?