Forums Latest Members

New Hodinkee Writeup on the X-33

  1. duc Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    1,352
    Likes
    6,364
  2. Larry S Color Commentator for the Hyperbole. Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    12,544
    Likes
    49,826
    All these articles / posts of late. I’m starting to want one of these.
     
  3. Wivac Terribly special Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    1,897
    Likes
    16,977
    I've had one on my list all year and if it wasn't for buying a new chunk of building....
     
  4. duc Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    1,352
    Likes
    6,364
    Although I'm not wearing it today, here is a snap, and my commitment to be wearing it tomorrow:

    X33.jpg
     
    0uss, larryganz, JohnnyRocket and 3 others like this.
  5. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    8,738
    Likes
    69,173
    While I appreciate the sophisticated capabilities of the X-33, they’d be wasted on me.

    And anyway, I am not sure this new fangled battery/digital technology will catch on.

    Batteries in a watch for goodness sake! :eek:
     
    kkt, Wryfox, noelekal and 7 others like this.
  6. duc Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    1,352
    Likes
    6,364
    I almost shot good beer out of my nose while reading this.
     
    Yak1 and Darlinboy like this.
  7. Yak1 Oct 8, 2019

    Posts
    305
    Likes
    1,983
    I had committed to no batteries/charging for my timepieces—however, given my recent interest in the F300’s and the X-33, I’m probably gonna have to walk that back.
     
  8. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Oct 9, 2019

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    10,907
    Any ideas how the numbers of classic Speedmaster chronographs turn out against the production numbers of X-33 ?
     
  9. padders Oooo subtitles! Oct 9, 2019

    Posts
    8,996
    Likes
    13,941
    Be aware that you would be lucky to get more than 2-3 years out of a cell on either if you actually use it. It is the short battery life that puts me off the X-33 since it isn't really designed to be user serviceable, what with 9 tiny fiddly screws to lose then there can be issues getting the new cell to work after changing. It may be better on the recent Gen3 X-33, I love the 1665 and 1666 movement Omega models (and still have a Seamaster multifunction 150m) but the battery life is a big drawback IMO. The f300s are even more battery hungry, they can eat a cell 18 months but are far easier to change than with the X-33.
     
    Edited Oct 9, 2019
    SpeedyPhill likes this.
  10. JohnnyRocket Oct 9, 2019

    Posts
    222
    Likes
    279
    Well now, I think you can look at the ratio of the number of watch Winding
    Sessions in a given week and the associated reset the date /day/ correct time fumble vs. Oh it’s flashing I guess it’s time to go to the Ad ...shoot the shit with sales girl - drink my latte ...and change the battery every 2 yrs.
    Ok. Now- I’d
    admit if you are the type of guy who can’t keep his fingers of the back light button
    That ratio of battery life changes. But I admit I kind of like just slipping my X 33 on
    Going out the door for the weekend and not having to worry about winding the watch sometime in my pending hangover at the ski slopes or the beach. I have at least 4 mechanical watches that I do enjoy a lot. But the reset thing can be a pain
    Depending on the watch. My Explorer 2 is a pain to reset. The Z 33 and X 33 have
    Sleep modes that do save battery life when not worn after a few days. So it really depends what you wear how often and for what.
     
  11. Tubber Oct 10, 2019

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    I have a Gen 2 X-33 and don't mind the battery change intervals. At least it has an EOL indicator. A battery change and re-seal is £60 from a well respected watchmaker in the UK which I don't find excessive. They make good travel watches and being Titanium they are very light.
     
  12. JohnnyRocket Oct 10, 2019

    Posts
    222
    Likes
    279
    You really have to love the comfort and the light weight of the titanium. And really handy features
     
  13. JohnnyRocket Oct 10, 2019

    Posts
    222
    Likes
    279
  14. JohnnyRocket Oct 10, 2019

    Posts
    222
    Likes
    279
    Yep..You got right where I live. Hahaha...
     
  15. Kringkily Omega Collector / Hunter Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    5,505
    Likes
    4,781
    The gen 2 is my favorite. All the upgrades to the gen 1 and great size and weight. The current ones are a bit large for me (small guy :( ...) they all look cool though
     
  16. Tubber Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    Are the current ones much larger than the old Gen 2?
     
  17. JohnnyRocket Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    222
    Likes
    279
    3FA8C01D-3584-4F79-9F6A-82971239E56A.jpeg The SkyWalker x-33 wears almost identically in size on my wrist. The new Gen 3
    Has of course a much different face and digital display. Very similar in capabilities
    But I find the illumination back light feature is I think muck brighter on the Gen 2.
    The Z-33 on the other hand is a much different horse.
    It’s much larger in case height, but because it’s titanium it’s not that heavy. Plus the red digital is smokin sick. As My son would say. I ‘m lucky to have all the X 33
    In my collection. I mix things up with Z on occasion. It’s my artiste watch...
    When I want to solicit a reaction! A556C92A-7278-48AD-A77F-951BB3058D40.jpeg C841C077-1AD0-40EF-8076-35537D4517FB.jpeg 26BF4BC3-10A3-4946-9BF6-E62AEE717285.jpeg
     
    larryganz likes this.
  18. Kringkily Omega Collector / Hunter Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    5,505
    Likes
    4,781
    New ones are 45mm
     
  19. Tubber Oct 11, 2019

    Posts
    1,926
    Likes
    6,893
    Would you be kind enough to show a comparison photo of the Z-33 next to a Gen 2?
     
  20. JohnnyRocket Nov 19, 2019

    Posts
    222
    Likes
    279
    Sure. When I get a chance I’ll post that photo. The Z is a beast.