New here. First watch advice.

Posts
11
Likes
1
Hi guys,

I'm looking to buy my first Omega. The only high end watch I've ever owned was a Breitling about a decade ago. I'm really enamored with the blue side of the moon aventurine. I'm trying to figure out how much I should be paying for one since omega doesn't seem to be selling them anymore.
 
Posts
452
Likes
817
Hi guys,

I'm looking to buy my first Omega. The only high end watch I've ever owned was a Breitling about a decade ago. I'm really enamored with the blue side of the moon aventurine. I'm trying to figure out how much I should be paying for one since omega doesn't seem to be selling them anymore.

Asking price on Chrono24 ranges from $11,000 to $20,000. Depending on your patience and risk tolerance, you may be able to acquire one for less.
 
Posts
11
Likes
1
Asking price on Chrono24 ranges from $11,000 to $20,000. Depending on your patience and risk tolerance, you may be able to acquire one for less.
I can be patient, I don't really want to take a big risk.
 
Posts
1,615
Likes
2,363
Jomashop has one right now (I mean, call them to confirm it’s in stock before ordering, just in case), brand new, for 10,800 US, which is a pretty solid deal. It probably won’t come with the OEM warranty, if that matters—but that too is worth asking about. They may also have a coupon or be willing to negotiate on price.

Have you tried one on? You’re probably aware, but just in case: it’s a > 44mm watch, and it’s over 17mm thick. This is not a graceful piece that will slip unnoticed under a cuff—it’s a huge, thick watch. Because the lugs are relatively stocky, the span across the wrist might be only 50mm, so depending on your wrist size/shape you might be able to wear it with it seeming like a Panerai hockey puck, but—just something to be aware of. I really wish they’d done a version of this in the 40mm range.
 
Posts
11
Likes
1
Jomashop has one right now (I mean, call them to confirm it’s in stock before ordering, just in case), brand new, for 10,800 US, which is a pretty solid deal. It probably won’t come with the OEM warranty, if that matters—but that too is worth asking about. They may also have a coupon or be willing to negotiate on price.

Have you tried one on? You’re probably aware, but just in case: it’s a > 44mm watch, and it’s over 17mm thick. This is not a graceful piece that will slip unnoticed under a cuff—it’s a huge, thick watch. Because the lugs are relatively stocky, the span across the wrist might be only 50mm, so depending on your wrist size/shape you might be able to wear it with it seeming like a Panerai hockey puck, but—just something to be aware of. I really wish they’d done a version of this in the 40mm range.
Thanks for the reply. I'm not worried about cuffs since I rarely wear dress shirts. As for jomashop, I emailed them and they don't have it in stock. They also don't know when they'd be able to get one.
 
Posts
1,615
Likes
2,363
Ah. Stinks that they do that—listing pieces they don’t have. Chrono24 has a lot of those too—sometimes a majority of the listings are fake.

Definitely try it (or another of the watches in that size category) on before committing car-money to it.
 
Posts
195
Likes
492
Obligatory picture. Its quite the looker if you have come across in person.
 
Posts
11
Likes
1
Obligatory picture. Its quite the looker if you have come across in person.
I've been watching alot of videos and reading alot of reviews as I originally wanted the new moonwatch. Then I stumbled upon dark side of the moon which led to this one. From every video I've seen its gorgeous, plus my favorite color is blue.
 
Posts
20,819
Likes
47,725
It strikes me as the kind of watch that looks cool when you first see it, but soon gets old. Personally, I think that all of the Speedmasters with coated cases fall into that category, but TBH this one takes busy and gimmicky to a whole new level.
Edited:
 
Posts
431
Likes
606
It strikes me as the kind of watch that looks cool when you first see it, but soon gets old. Personally, I think that all of the Speedmasters with coated cases fall into that category, but TBH this one takes busy and gimmicky to a whole new level.
Yeah I don't love the case color, nor the 17mm thick! Obviously to each their own. But I would be curious to see the dial in a smaller/thinner, regular steel or titanium case...
 
Posts
11
Likes
1
It strikes me as the kind of watch that looks cool when you first see it, but soon gets old. Personally, I think that all of the Speedmasters with coated cases fall into that category, but TBH this one takes busy and gimmicky to a whole new level.
I understand everyone has their own personal taste, but what is gimmicky about it?
 
Posts
256
Likes
192
I think it's a fun and playful watch, but definitely wouldn't be my first watch.

I think a regular Speedmaster moonwatch (hesalite) or a Rolex Explorer II (polar) are fantastic choices for your first luxury watch.

Reasons:

The regular Speedmaster moonwatch (hesalite) is probably the most iconic watch with the greatest heritage.

The Rolex Explorer II (polar) is just a beautiful watch, and the last Rolex watch to be unmolested by gold or diamonds.
 
Posts
431
Likes
606
I understand everyone has their own personal taste, but what is gimmicky about it?
I'm not knowledgeable enough to provide a confident answer (and I'll let Dan S speak for himself), but perhaps some of the "gimmicky-ness" stems from the totality of all of the deviations from an otherwise timeless design (e.g. the size, aesthetics, and materials), which may not age as well as a classic Speedmaster.

For me, individually, none of the elements of the watch are necessarily an insult (and I actually particularly like the dial), but as a complete package, it may go a little too far (particularly the size and color of the case). Especially if it were to be my only Speedmaster/Omega/Luxury watch. I could see someone adding this to their collection if money were no object and/or they were a Speedmaster super fan and had most of the other bases covered. But sometimes the heart wants the heart wants, lol. However, typically (speaking from personal experience) tastes become refined over time, with experience and knowledge. And I get the sense that some of the things that attract someone to this now might not in the future. But then again, if your watch collection grows, it could remain a unique piece that stands out. There are no rules! To provide a positive point of view (in case you haven't seen it), here's Tim's video from Watchbox (although he is of course trying to sell it).
 
Posts
1,615
Likes
2,363
This is not a perfect analogy, by any measure, but (imo) it’d be like having a humvee in desert camouflage, kitted out with decorative combat armor, as your daily commuting vehicle to the office. It’s a lot.

This is an enormous watch, in a conspicuously unusual, colorful case material, with a sparkly outer-space-like dial and a photorealistic moonphase on it. Again… it’s a lot.

Not making any assumptions about anyone else, but from my own experience and what I’ve seen happen with others, I’d agree with what was said above: a lot of us get drawn into this hobby by extravagant or unusual pieces like this—the exotic coolness factor—and then, as we get more and more into watches and their tech and history, and styling, we find ourselves developing deeper appreciation for classic designs and the major milestones of horology, and gravitate toward more restrained pieces. Again, not making assumptions about you, but the worry could be that this is a great enticement watch, but that within a few months you’ll decide it’s too overstated and want to sell it to fund a “real” Speedmaster Moonwatch. If you do that, you will—almost assuredly—lose several thousand dollars in the exchange.

It’s a very cool piece—mesmerizing. But as an only watch or only high-end watch, it’s going to seem like a risky choice to many of us. …But we’re not you!
 
Posts
11
Likes
1
This is not a perfect analogy, by any measure, but (imo) it’d be like having a humvee in desert camouflage, kitted out with decorative combat armor, as your daily commuting vehicle to the office. It’s a lot.

This is an enormous watch, in a conspicuously unusual, colorful case material, with a sparkly outer-space-like dial and a photorealistic moonphase on it. Again… it’s a lot.

Not making any assumptions about anyone else, but from my own experience and what I’ve seen happen with others, I’d agree with what was said above: a lot of us get drawn into this hobby by extravagant or unusual pieces like this—the exotic coolness factor—and then, as we get more and more into watches and their tech and history, and styling, we find ourselves developing deeper appreciation for classic designs and the major milestones of horology, and gravitate toward more restrained pieces. Again, not making assumptions about you, but the worry could be that this is a great enticement watch, but that within a few months you’ll decide it’s too overstated and want to sell it to fund a “real” Speedmaster Moonwatch. If you do that, you will—almost assuredly—lose several thousand dollars in the exchange.

It’s a very cool piece—mesmerizing. But as an only watch or only high-end watch, it’s going to seem like a risky choice to many of us. …But we’re not you!
I get what you're saying. Ideally if I could get this watch for between 10-11k I would also try to buy a vintage moonwatch for between 4-5k as my overall budget is 15k.
 
Posts
6,911
Likes
12,966
I had a Blue Side a couple of years ago, but with the plain polished blue dial. Nice watch, very accurate, but it is a thick beast. And the small date dial at 9 o'clock is hard to read. I never could bond with it and traded it in for something else. In some natural light conditions the blue ceramic case can look a bit chalky and crayon like. It's a watch you need to see in person and view it in natural light to see if it is right for you.
Edited:
 
Posts
11
Likes
1
I had a Blue Side a couple of years ago, but with the plain polished blue dial. Nice watch, very accurate, but it is a thick beast. And the small date dial at 9 o'clock is hard to read. I never could bond with it and traded it in for something else. In some light natural light conditions the blue ceramic case can look a bit chalky and crayon like. It's a watch you need to see in person and view it in natural light to see if it is right for you.
See, I don't like that one as much. I don't think there's enough contrast. In my opinion the aventurine dial is what makes this watch.
 
Posts
6,911
Likes
12,966
See, I don't like that one as much. I don't think there's enough contrast. In my opinion the aventurine dial is what makes this watch.
Agree the dial is the attraction here, but there is a LOT of blue going on with these watches.....blue case, blue dial, blue bezel, blue pushers, blue crown, blue clasp, blue strap. They are a monochromatic theme, too much blue in my opinion, but it's all personal choice.
 
Posts
431
Likes
606
See, I don't like that one as much. I don't think there's enough contrast. In my opinion the aventurine dial is what makes this watch.

And how much do you like the rest of the blue elements that @Evitzee mentioned? And the diameter/thickness? Did Omega put any similar dial in any other model? And in terms of sporty blue watches, do any divers/Seamasters appeal to you? Or it's really this watch/dial? Do you intend to have any other luxury watches?
Edited:
 
Posts
11
Likes
1
And how much do you like the rest of the blue elements that @Therich84 mentioned? And the diameter/thickness? Did Omega put any similar dial in any other model? And in terms of sporty blue watches, do any divers/Seamasters appeal to you? Or it's really this watch/dial? Do you intend to have any other luxury watches?
I like the blue and think the dial gives just enough contrast. They have a similar dial in a steel case in another moonphase that I like but I haven't seen it for less than 16k. Not really a fan of the seamasters. I also want to buy a 60s moonwatch.