Forums Latest Members
  1. shadowfax Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    Hi All,

    Would really appreciate some advice on a vintage constellation I came across on eBay and was thinking of buying. Priced right now around $600 US which seems almost too good to be true.

    6AF276B5-4F4C-4DA6-8A13-FF4BA352636D.png A0508552-CE6E-4BEF-A8F4-4CC8AC0AA9C3.png DD3F9115-8AB0-4353-B634-D97232ABC7ED.png 63549E71-6683-4D74-867B-F3DE1273E6E0.png BDC076F5-B317-4D03-A381-F3E9F1AC6D23.png
    Also no pictures of the movement nor any reference made to the ref number or manufacturing year.

    Would really appreciate anyone’s thoughts and advice regarding authenticity/pricing!

    Thanks a ton in advance :)
     
  2. Shabbaz Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    4,897
    Likes
    17,855
    Unclear pictures but 99,9% sure it's a redial.
     
    shadowfax, MtV, Peemacgee and 3 others like this.
  3. qazwsx1 Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    699
    Likes
    2,817
    I agree with redial too.
     
    shadowfax likes this.
  4. Lacazema Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    107
    Likes
    124
    Shouldn't it say "officially certified" under the "chronometer" ?
     
    shadowfax likes this.
  5. Maskelyne Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    365
    Likes
    446
    Here is an enhanced and enlarged picture. It doesn´t look so bad in my eyes.

    A0508552-CE6E-4BEF-A8F4-4CC8AC0AA9C3.jpg
     
    shadowfax and janice&fred like this.
  6. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    5,140
    Likes
    7,851
    not if it is a 14381
     
    shadowfax likes this.
  7. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    5,140
    Likes
    7,851
    Really difficult to assess properly with those blurry pictures.

    If the hands are original, then the dial isn’t (and vice versa)
    Minute ticks are probably too close to the ‘pie pan’ edge for this reference (and inconsistent in distance from the edge)
    Second O in Chronometer is not centred on the M as it should be.
    Impossible to tell if the font is serifed as it should be.

    It’s a black dial - always caution first.....
     
    shadowfax likes this.
  8. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    12,192
    Likes
    15,692
    Hands don’t look right either. This seems to be a “bitsa watch” as in, a bitsa this and a bitsa that...:oops:

    I’d run away.
    gatorcpa
     
  9. gbesq Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    7,816
    Likes
    39,853
    A very high percentage of black dial vintage Constellations are redials. Caution advised.
     
  10. cristos71 Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    7,153
    Likes
    32,929
    From those low res pictures I'd wager on a 14381 with original dial. Unfortunately the rest is a bit of a mess, wrong crown, wrong hands, gold cap missing from the case, etc. So although it's been in my watch list since it was listed it isn't something I'll be bidding on.

    Here's my very similar 14381 for comparison

    20200413_184843.jpg
     
    qazwsx1 likes this.
  11. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Sep 9, 2020

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    The one on left looks 2852 to me ;)