Forums Latest Members
  1. LM2611 May 21, 2019

    Posts
    67
    Likes
    20
    Hi all,

    I am looking at a speedy that is from 1992 and would like to have your opinion on this. I am very much a speedy noob. I am unsure about some of the parts found on this watch and would like to know your judgemet on those - Dial, bezel and hands ETC.

    Thanks for all your help
     
    Capture.JPG Capture2.JPG Capture3.JPG
  2. LM2611 May 21, 2019

    Posts
    67
    Likes
    20
    Additionally, the serial number on the case is different to the movement. Is this normal for the Speedmaster Professional of this era, is not connected in any with the movement serial number. Is the serial on the case simply a case number? Thanks
     
  3. WYO_Watch May 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,219
    Likes
    3,766
    No, it is not normal. Serial numbers on the movement and serial numbers on the bottom of the midcase should match.
     
  4. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker May 21, 2019

    Posts
    26,464
    Likes
    65,607
    Spot on - they should be the same number, and if not it's a franken of some kind...
     
    red crowned, Foo2rama and LM2611 like this.
  5. The Father Went out for smokes in ‘78 not seen since May 21, 2019

    Posts
    2,579
    Likes
    14,033
    Have 1991 Speedmaster. Case does not have the serial number. Case serial number and movement serial didn’t start till later in the 90’s correct?
     
  6. WYO_Watch May 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,219
    Likes
    3,766
    @The Father I believe that is correct. Do you have an extract for your 1991? I am a little nervous to state an exact year without one.

    Couple more things to point out for @LM2611

    1. I believe the hands are superluminova (service hands). Look at how white the lume is in comparison to the hand paint.

    2. Look at the black retainer ring at around 9:30. It’s cracked and *edit (I guess this is normal). You can see this in both pictures showing the dial.

    3. Bezel looks fine (it’s not an accented e and it isn’t a tall font). I forget the version name, but many examples I’ve seen share this bezel including one I own. Dial also looks correct, but I would want to see it in some other light (looks a bit whiter than I would expect). Bracelet also looks good but the case does show wear from strap changes (not a big deal to me but is to some).
     
    Edited May 21, 2019
    Foo2rama likes this.
  7. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker May 21, 2019

    Posts
    26,464
    Likes
    65,607
    I have no idea how the OP dated the watch in question - as we know there are serial number listings that can be very misleading out on the internet, so the whole idea of "should it have a serial number or not" to me isn't terribly relevant until we confirm the dating of the watch. But regardless of that if it has one and it doesn't match the one on the movement, this already identifies it as a franken no matter what the age is.

    The split in the tension ring is completely normal. Omega usually positions it near the bottom of the dial so it's less obvious, but they all have this.
     
    WYO_Watch likes this.
  8. WYO_Watch May 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,219
    Likes
    3,766
    :cautious: is going to check all his Speedies... but already knows @Archer is correct haha

    Well the hands still suck! :D Then again it does mean that this watch likely found its way to a watchmaker at some point... which is more than many watches can say
     
  9. The Father Went out for smokes in ‘78 not seen since May 21, 2019

    Posts
    2,579
    Likes
    14,033
    Serial # on movement is correct year. Dealer I purchased from has top of line watches and would not obfuscate on the specifics of the watches. Best thing I ever bought....so far.
    1995 was the year that case and movement both had matching numbers. (I believe)
     
  10. WYO_Watch May 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,219
    Likes
    3,766
    Correct according to what? This is no dig at your watch or at your watch guy, I’m just saying that it’s hard to pinpoint dates on these. Archer suggested the same thing above with the internet serial ranges being a bit misleading.

    I’m going to say it was before 1995. I have a Speedmaster that was purchased in January of 1993 with a matching serial on the case and movement (and warranty card).
     
  11. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. May 21, 2019

    Posts
    17,106
    Likes
    25,350
    Serial case mismatch...

    Tritium dial, appears to have luminova hands which are post 1999....

    I’d pass.

    Why is the rehaut clipping the T Swiss made T?
     
    Edited May 22, 2019
    BenBagbag likes this.
  12. The Father Went out for smokes in ‘78 not seen since May 21, 2019

    Posts
    2,579
    Likes
    14,033
    Serial number 482575xx

    1991 ST 145.0022 861 4825xxxxx
    From the various sites that list serial #’s and the corresponding years of production

    Would have to believe the sites are pretty accurate.
     
  13. LM2611 May 22, 2019

    Posts
    67
    Likes
    20
  14. asrnj77 May 22, 2019

    Posts
    1,412
    Likes
    2,258
    My ‘91 has the serial on the lug and it matches the movement
     
    A875AF43-8327-4CBA-980C-E74A2FD6F2C6.jpeg
    pascs, BenBagbag and The Father like this.
  15. padders Oooo subtitles! May 22, 2019

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Really? ILMS gives March 1990 for that serial with 5s for the 2 missing digits. The only way to be 100% sure is an extract. There is another thread discussing exactly this issue on here at present:

    See:
    https://omegaforums.net/threads/help-with-3590-50.95566/
     
  16. The Father Went out for smokes in ‘78 not seen since May 22, 2019

    Posts
    2,579
    Likes
    14,033
    What do I know.