PandaSPUR
·Got a call from my guy at the NYC Omega Boutique Friday morning, he knew I was deciding between the Steel/Orange UD and the Ti UD. They received the Ti one, but not the orange one, so I took it as a sign and paid for the Ti one. According to them this is the first and only Ti UD available for sale in the US.
I went in on Saturday to pick up the watch.
Greeted my awesome sales associate and he guided me to the back where I saw this nice spread:
Immediately unboxed, put on the watch, and took some potato pics:
Its is thiccc and I love it:
My tiny girlfriend also tried it
Took a better pic later at dinner:
I had a long day so better pictures had to wait. Someone on WUS asked me for comparison pics, so here is a copy/paste of my reply from there.
Found some time today to do some comparisons.
Omega Ultra Deep Ti: 45.5mm x 18.12mm
Omega PO Casamigos: 45.5mm x 17.6mm (same dimensions as any Deep Black PO GMT)
Omega Sedna Speedy: 42mm x 13.18mm (same dimensions as any 3861 Speedy)
Seiko SLA037: 39.9mm x 14.6mm
I picked these watches for a few reasons.
The Casamigos is the closest Omega watch in size that I own, and the general shape of modern POs is probably well known to people considering the UD.
The Speedy because everyone on this forum probably knows that one.
The SLA037 because its my smallest dive watch.
Pictures taken with a 50mm lens (Sony a7C and GM 50/1.2) to avoid as much distortion as I could.
Camera was mounted on a tripod, and I tried to place my arm in as close to the same position as possible for each shot.
Irrelevant to the physical size comparison, but I also kept the camera in Manual mode so all pictures are exposed the same way. Any post-processing adjustments were also synced between the pictures.
From biggest diameter to smallest:
From thickest to thinnest:
And since I was in disbelief about how light this watch felt (despite reviews also stating 123g):
I went in on Saturday to pick up the watch.
Greeted my awesome sales associate and he guided me to the back where I saw this nice spread:
Immediately unboxed, put on the watch, and took some potato pics:
Its is thiccc and I love it:
My tiny girlfriend also tried it
Took a better pic later at dinner:
I had a long day so better pictures had to wait. Someone on WUS asked me for comparison pics, so here is a copy/paste of my reply from there.
Found some time today to do some comparisons.
Omega Ultra Deep Ti: 45.5mm x 18.12mm
Omega PO Casamigos: 45.5mm x 17.6mm (same dimensions as any Deep Black PO GMT)
Omega Sedna Speedy: 42mm x 13.18mm (same dimensions as any 3861 Speedy)
Seiko SLA037: 39.9mm x 14.6mm
I picked these watches for a few reasons.
The Casamigos is the closest Omega watch in size that I own, and the general shape of modern POs is probably well known to people considering the UD.
The Speedy because everyone on this forum probably knows that one.
The SLA037 because its my smallest dive watch.
Pictures taken with a 50mm lens (Sony a7C and GM 50/1.2) to avoid as much distortion as I could.
Camera was mounted on a tripod, and I tried to place my arm in as close to the same position as possible for each shot.
Irrelevant to the physical size comparison, but I also kept the camera in Manual mode so all pictures are exposed the same way. Any post-processing adjustments were also synced between the pictures.
From biggest diameter to smallest:
From thickest to thinnest:
And since I was in disbelief about how light this watch felt (despite reviews also stating 123g):














