In the unlikely event that I wanted to buy a watch from a dealer, I certainly wouldn't buy from one who uses artfully-lit photos like that. What are they trying to hide? Photos taken in normal lighting conditions, preferably natural light, are essential to assess any watch properly. I'll repeat what I've previously said on this forum: the quality of a watch is usually in inverse proportion to the slickness of the photos.
That applies to the older pre-Cosmic Seamasters. It's true in 99.9% of cases, but there is an exception which was posted on here not that long ago. It's one of the chunky, desirable case refs that sometimes houses a chronometer. I can't remember the model number but I expect someone does.
Click to expand...