My grail watch - 145.022 1983 - new bezel?

Posts
3
Likes
6
I’m an astrophysicist and I’ve wanted a moon watch since I was a kid. And finally, here’s my new speedmaster. It’s a 145.022 (or I guess 145.0022 depending on your point of view) from 1983.

I think the bezel and dial may have been replaced, so I thought I would ask here. I believe the ship of Theseus is still his ship, so I’ve no issue with that at all, but I thought I would check. Thanks for looking.

I’ve also paired it with my 60’s N600-ES slide rule. The exact slide rule they took with them on the moon flights.
 
Posts
33,463
Likes
38,167
Given it’s an ‘83 it’s a great watch overall that you can just enjoy and not worry about those aspects much as there isn’t a great dial of variance from that time period onwards with the exception of luminova.

Enjoy it, great watch to have!
 
Posts
2,383
Likes
5,242
Why do you think the bezel and dial have been replaced?
 
Posts
1,404
Likes
2,863
Welcome here and congrats on finding your special watch !
From what i can see on this one picture the dial is printed with t swiss t, so a Tritium dial which is correct for this watch.
If the lume colour of the hands are close to the colour of the hour makers lume they likely are a good match/original to this watch but you need to post better pictures ( outside light ) from the front for members here to judge.
 
Posts
23,373
Likes
51,995
You will need to post better photos without the compression artifacts.
 
Posts
2,716
Likes
5,488
Very nice looks all good and original to me (based on 1 photo)
Wear in good health.
I remember that slide rule I may still have it!
 
Posts
98
Likes
68
Welcome to the forum! It is nice to have fellow physicists joining the forum and sharing the same passion. Wear your watch in good health.
 
Posts
597
Likes
558
You appear to have the C3 "tall and open S" dial which would be correct for Speedmasters from 1977-1990.

Why do you think it is incorrect?

Enjoy the watch!
 
Posts
3
Likes
6
The person I bought it from (who was super awesome), said that someone he showed it to thought the dial was a replacement, and possible the bezel (I mixed them up in the original post), but he thought it was original (but kindly didn't want to lie by omission). It's great to hear that it's era appropriate. It was originally sold in Japan, and then he bought it a few years back in the UK.

All the movements the Astronauts wore are well out of my price range (as is a new watch), but I've wanted a Speedmaster since I was a kid. I bought a Bulova Lunar Pilot as a way to scratch that itch, and I love it, but it only made me want a speedmaster more. I started to consider Moonswatchs and Pogues, and other spaceworn watches, but I realised that all of that would just put a Speedmaster even further away, so I held fire until this. My entire watch collection is just a metal Casio, a Lunar Pilot and now this.

Kindly my partner understood how much it mattered to me and supported the decision. I guess, as a midlife crisis can go, it's not too bad.

I was excited for a 145.022 because it was used as part of a thermal physics experiment in Apollo 17, in 1972, which is, tangentially, related to my PhD from back in the day, and they kept making the 145.022 until my birth, so this is both a birth year, and a pretty close version to a version that flew, whilst simultaneously, being one of the cheapest ways to pick one up.

Unfortunately It's packed away now until nearer xmas and I can't stop thinking about it. Ha ha.