Davidt
·Again, it’s not “right” for 67, 1967 is simply the approximate date of production. Those serial number dating charts need to be taken with a huge punch of salt.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Again, it’s not “right” for 67, 1967 is simply the approximate date of production. Those serial number dating charts need to be taken with a huge punch of salt.
So we know most of it is fine- but you still have to ask yourself if you can live with the mismatched hands and moldy dial. Even if the “price is right”, you will either have to live with it as-is, or spend months/years hunting down the parts to make this one better. Having done the later and spent almost as much as I paid for the watch to get it straitened out- I at least had a clean dial and case to start.
Yes I agree. The hands, once you see how incorrect they are, it is difficult to unsee. I'll reserve judgemnt until I get a better, clearer look at the dial.
TOTALLY agree, despite this model being desirable ... the case is in awful condition, the original handset is next to impossible to track down, as well as a bezel ... is it really worth ur money to spend on such a watch ??? ............. or save a bit more and find another in better condition ?
Some clearer iamges
[/QUOT/QUOTE]
ask the seller to take a photo with the watch laying on its case back and the camera directly pointed at the dial
Yup, thank you for all the help and opinions, it is hugely appreciated. Really helps to discuss to get a clearer picture. Asking price is just over $2k. Going to pass and keep on looking.
I guess half the fun is in the hunt 😀
Oh, and if you like the C-case style (which is polarizing for sure) then the Omega trifecta IMO is the SM120, the C-cased Constellation, and the Speedmaster MKII. All three can be had in stunning condition for less than a new Speedmaster Pro.
I think their SM120 is undervalued and they’re a great watch. However, it’s certainly a watch where it pays to take your time, set a sensible budget and buy a good example from the start rather than a doer upper as 1) many of the parts are no longer available, and 2) as they’re skin divers, they can look rough especially with water damage and mouldy lume.
It’s not enough to find a complete/original example, it needs to be attractive too. This one isn’t one I’d be chasing unless it was dirt cheap.
Shame about the case polish. It looks like that was done recently and I’ll bet it looked better before

I think their SM120 is undervalued and they’re a great watch. However, it’s certainly a watch where it pays to take your time, set a sensible budget and buy a good example from the start rather than a doer upper as 1) many of the parts are no longer available, and 2) as they’re skin divers, they can look rough especially with water damage and mouldy lume.
It’s not enough to find a complete/original example, it needs to be attractive too. This one isn’t one I’d be chasing unless it was dirt cheap.
Shame about the case polish. It looks like that was done recently and I’ll bet it looked better before
Yes, once those I saw those clearer images the case polishing was very evident. Nothing one can do to reverse that. I didn't realise until now that the hands were so difficult to replace.
Hello everyone. I'm considering this 135.027, asking price is 1355EUR. According to the seller it has been serviced.
What do you guys think, is it a fair price? I've tried to read through the thread and to my untrained eye the watch looks good, I'm just a bit unsure about the lume, especially the lume dot on the bezel. Looks a bit too good, considering the watch is 50 years old.