- Posts
- 1,818
- Likes
- 2,569
watchlovr
·DJ's
Most Underrated Vintage Rolex
- Posts
- 853
- Likes
- 3,869
emilio
·The early datejusts with gilt or honeycomb dials allready command a high premium..
- Posts
- 1,933
- Likes
- 8,478
- Posts
- 6
- Likes
- 29
- Posts
- 4,644
- Likes
- 31,227
- Posts
- 223
- Likes
- 304
milwatch126
·Day-Date 1803 without bracelet.
- Posts
- 349
- Likes
- 1,546
Furze
·
- Posts
- 362
- Likes
- 254
Swissgmt1675
·17000 oysterquartz for me all the way...only 25 000 pieces made and a design to die for...😉
- Posts
- 1,813
- Likes
- 9,393
Longbow
·
Ah, you've been looking at that Turn-O-Graph too then😒. My birth year......must resist.
- Posts
- 1,626
- Likes
- 6,219
- Posts
- 4,534
- Likes
- 9,330
Bill Sohne
··Bill @ ΩFHow about a yellow 1802
How about a white gold 1803
Good hunting
Bill Sohne
How about a white gold 1803
Good hunting
Bill Sohne
- Posts
- 223
- Likes
- 304
milwatch126
·How rare is a Spaniard?
- Posts
- 8,890
- Likes
- 28,366
tyrantlizardrex
·Ah, you've been looking at that Turn-O-Graph too then😒. My birth year......must resist.
No, I'm out of the Rolex game. Sticking to what I know I'd like, and maintaining focus. 👍
- Posts
- 3,938
- Likes
- 45,349
styggpyggeno1
·Ref. 6024
+ side = old, very, very low production numbers (cirka 1000), large size for its age - 36 mm, smooth bezel, quirky with its one side visiable lugholes, high dome plexi, killer hands, etc.
- side = no famous history, cool wearers, mountain tops, adventures at sea, etc.
Bought this one for coffee money in 2010-11. Ref 6024, cal 710, circa 1952. They do not surface often but when they do they are not expensive.
Today I wear it on a 19mm Rolex Oyster 78350 with 557 bits.
Earlier I had it on a Hirsch Ocean shark.
+ side = old, very, very low production numbers (cirka 1000), large size for its age - 36 mm, smooth bezel, quirky with its one side visiable lugholes, high dome plexi, killer hands, etc.
- side = no famous history, cool wearers, mountain tops, adventures at sea, etc.
Bought this one for coffee money in 2010-11. Ref 6024, cal 710, circa 1952. They do not surface often but when they do they are not expensive.
Today I wear it on a 19mm Rolex Oyster 78350 with 557 bits.
Earlier I had it on a Hirsch Ocean shark.
Edited:
- Posts
- 223
- Likes
- 304
milwatch126
·Simply, Quite stunning!
P.S. first dibs 😀
M
P.S. first dibs 😀
M
Ref. 6024
+ side = old, very, very low production numbers (cirka 1000), large size for its age - 36 mm, smooth bezel, quirky with its one side visiable lugholes, high dome plexi, killer hands, etc.
- side = no famous history, cool wearers, mountain tops, adventures at sea, etc.
Bought this one for coffee money in 2010-11. Ref 6024, cal 710, circa 1952. They do not surface often but when they do they are not expensive.
Today I wear it on a 19mm Rolex Oyster 78350 with 557 bits.
Earlier I had it on a Hirsch Ocean shark.
- Posts
- 2,510
- Likes
- 3,732
rcs914
·No, I'm out of the Rolex game. Sticking to what I know I'd like, and maintaining focus. 👍
Until you mentioned the Turn-o-graph a couple weeks ago I hadn't ever seen it before. Definitely one of the few I would be interested in. Maybe that and a DJ with an engine turned bezel and a blue sunburst dial. But still not a market I plan to play in either.
Similar threads
- Posts
- 4
- Views
- 1K
- Posts
- 3
- Views
- 881
