Travelller
Β·So yesterday I celebrated SpeedyTuesday with the distant, (adopted) 2nd cousin π of the MoonWatch, aka MoonSwatch
I recall posting my thoughts with some amusement π€¦ as the masses lined up on that inaugural Saturday back in March. But I was also quick to note I'd like one too, being a big Speedmaster fan π but I saw no rush, as it wasn't limited.
So here we are, Oct. and with the help of one very cool fellow WIS, I've managed to finally get one.
Not just any one, but the only one I really want, the MoonSwatch Mercury π₯°
My first impressions (as I'd never "handled" one before) is that it's one very cool Swatch π Had they managed to use a mechanical movement, it would be "the" Swatch to have.
Speaking of which, I have only three other Swatch pieces, two of which are mechanical and one other Quartz (which can/ could be used as a ski pass).
Re. dial, bezel, crystal - all of a decent quality as far as I can tell. As for this Bio-Ceramic business, it looks & feels like plastic, albeit HQ plastic. Mine has a hairline fracture on the back of the (solid) case... remind me not to drop it... π
Re. internals - it's ETA's G10.212 ND Quartz with "standard" chronograph functions. Hand alignment is iffy. Mine started out perfect, but while playing around with it, the minutes sub-reg hand managed to go out of alignment. After a few resets, it managed to go back in alignment... go figure π€
Note the minutes sub-register (10 o'clock sub-reg.) should be pointing directly at the 60min marker
The [dial] printing tolerances are not great; aligned at 12:00 (VIP), also at 3:00, but around 6:00~9:00 things get really sketchy. Note in the following shot the chronograph's seconds hand rests between 36 & 37. This is a Quartz movement and the hand(s) only move every second and therefore should only "land" on the seconds markers.
Ok, fine, it's not a 7Kβ¬ Speedmaster, therefore wider tolerances are to be expected. Which brings me to my last point. I love this Swatch, but I'm not sure it's worth the asking price (260β¬). Perhaps I've been out of touch with the Swatch World but my [Swatch] Automatics were all under 200β¬. My steel Timex Marlin "Peanuts" mechanical was also cheaper at 250β¬.
So to wrap up said first impressions, it's a cool Swatch π, just wish it came in at closer to β¬200. π€
~~~
There are some nice details π ...
...and some not-so-nice π
I recall posting my thoughts with some amusement π€¦ as the masses lined up on that inaugural Saturday back in March. But I was also quick to note I'd like one too, being a big Speedmaster fan π but I saw no rush, as it wasn't limited.
So here we are, Oct. and with the help of one very cool fellow WIS, I've managed to finally get one.
Not just any one, but the only one I really want, the MoonSwatch Mercury π₯°
My first impressions (as I'd never "handled" one before) is that it's one very cool Swatch π Had they managed to use a mechanical movement, it would be "the" Swatch to have.
Speaking of which, I have only three other Swatch pieces, two of which are mechanical and one other Quartz (which can/ could be used as a ski pass).
Re. dial, bezel, crystal - all of a decent quality as far as I can tell. As for this Bio-Ceramic business, it looks & feels like plastic, albeit HQ plastic. Mine has a hairline fracture on the back of the (solid) case... remind me not to drop it... π
Re. internals - it's ETA's G10.212 ND Quartz with "standard" chronograph functions. Hand alignment is iffy. Mine started out perfect, but while playing around with it, the minutes sub-reg hand managed to go out of alignment. After a few resets, it managed to go back in alignment... go figure π€
Note the minutes sub-register (10 o'clock sub-reg.) should be pointing directly at the 60min marker
The [dial] printing tolerances are not great; aligned at 12:00 (VIP), also at 3:00, but around 6:00~9:00 things get really sketchy. Note in the following shot the chronograph's seconds hand rests between 36 & 37. This is a Quartz movement and the hand(s) only move every second and therefore should only "land" on the seconds markers.
Ok, fine, it's not a 7Kβ¬ Speedmaster, therefore wider tolerances are to be expected. Which brings me to my last point. I love this Swatch, but I'm not sure it's worth the asking price (260β¬). Perhaps I've been out of touch with the Swatch World but my [Swatch] Automatics were all under 200β¬. My steel Timex Marlin "Peanuts" mechanical was also cheaper at 250β¬.
So to wrap up said first impressions, it's a cool Swatch π, just wish it came in at closer to β¬200. π€
~~~
There are some nice details π ...
...and some not-so-nice π
Edited: