Forums Latest Members
  1. bags1971 Oct 3, 2019

    Posts
    1,844
    Likes
    3,818
    064BA7A1-6D6E-4C7A-927D-860D6EC7DF04.png
  2. kelev_ra Oct 3, 2019

    Posts
    492
    Likes
    238
    You really think a dealer with knowledge about watches would not get an archive to confirm it is a legit mil? I don't think so...
    So I am pretty sure at least movement is not correct. Caseback can be engraved by pretty much everyone with the right equipment...

    I would't buy.
     
    Edited Oct 3, 2019
    Mark020 likes this.
  3. bags1971 Oct 3, 2019

    Posts
    1,844
    Likes
    3,818
    Yeh that’s what I was thinking why hasn’t a dealer got a extract
     
  4. simonsays Oct 3, 2019

    Posts
    1,344
    Likes
    1,902
    That serial number would be nearer the mark for a W10 not a 0552, the case back marked -64 is odd, I would expect it to be without a year designation. Odd to sell it as a bag of bits with no extract when you are a dealer?
     
    JanV likes this.
  5. omegaman Oct 3, 2019

    Posts
    255
    Likes
    379
    Old acquaintance... was auctioned by Bonhams in 2017... and did not sell. The S/N 22986300 by that time was not in the range and for a Mil SM300. So obviously someone bought a new movement... but did not do his homework. It's still not matching with a Royal Navy 0552, but as simonsaid with the Army W10 :D
     
    Mark020, simonsays, JanV and 3 others like this.
  6. Donn Chambers Oct 3, 2019

    Posts
    2,248
    Likes
    3,051
    Let’s see. It’s taken apart (if it was ever together in the first place). The dial doesn’t have a circled T AND the seller admits it has been relumed. Hands are a mess AND no clear shot of them.

    $10,000.

    Sounds like a bargain. ;)
     
    Davidt likes this.