Longines vintage catalogs

Posts
650
Likes
6,489
I am looking for vintage Longines catalogs of any year, but I can't find any. Do you have anyone you are willing to share;
 
Posts
7,639
Likes
26,477
It would be helpful if you could state what model and approximate year(s) that are of interest too you.

Regards,

Tony C.
 
Posts
650
Likes
6,489
Well I am interested about any catalogs that contain the Ultra-chron models so the timeframe should be from 1967-77.
 
Posts
7,639
Likes
26,477
Well, in terms of 1972 models that were offered in Japan, you're in luck! A dazzling array...

LGuc1.jpeg

LGuc2.jpeg

LGuc3.jpeg

LGuc4.jpeg

LGuc5.jpeg
 
Posts
2,279
Likes
6,536
Hi All,

Looking for a catalog for a 1946-7 Longines that has a 23M movement (#7386238) and 5863 model. Also, what does the 356 number on the caseback represent? Calling @Tony C. !

s-l1600.jpg

534910-64b681205fdcda6060824c48ce016131.jpg

534934-0b63561a247e6d40f96041b1c6bcbb8b.jpg
 
Posts
346
Likes
286
Hi All,

Looking for a catalog for a 1946-7 Longines that has a 23M movement (#7386238) and 5863 model. Also, what does the 356 number on the caseback represent? Calling @Tony C. !

s-l1600.jpg

534910-64b681205fdcda6060824c48ce016131.jpg

534934-0b63561a247e6d40f96041b1c6bcbb8b.jpg

I'm not sure if the rule of thumb extended to Longines-Wittnauer watches, but in Switzerland the numbers there would be the last three digits of the movement serial number.
 
Posts
7,639
Likes
26,477
Sorry, but I don't believe that I have any catalogues (or images) from that period. Very nice case, though!
 
Posts
2,753
Likes
4,806
Hi All,

Looking for a catalog for a 1946-7 Longines that has a 23M movement (#7386238) and 5863 model. Also, what does the 356 number on the caseback represent? Calling @Tony C. !
356 is a unique case number within the reference 5863. It is not connected to the serial number.
 
Posts
1,626
Likes
6,218
What is the reference of no.3 here? Love that case. 8352 doesn’t seem to return useful results.
 
Posts
2,279
Likes
6,536
356 is a unique case number within the reference 5863. It is not connected to the serial number.

It's a unique case number but not a serial number? I'm not sure I understand, please elaborate. Do you mean the serial number of the movement?
 
Posts
2,279
Likes
6,536
Very nice case, though!

That's what made me want to buy it!
I did find a similar one here (though that one appears to have had its dial cleaned, which lightened up the background but lost some of the print). I didn't find another on the web with that case.
 
Posts
7,639
Likes
26,477
Coincidentally, I bought this one with a similar case recently...

LGTur5.jpg
 
Posts
2,753
Likes
4,806
It's a unique case number but not a serial number? I'm not sure I understand, please elaborate. Do you mean the serial number of the movement?
It is a serial number but not the serial number. The serial number is on the movement.
 
Posts
810
Likes
1,642
Coincidentally, I bought this one with a similar case recently...

LGTur5.jpg

That’s a beaut. Don’t see a double signed Longines everyday. 12.68 @Tony C.?
 
Posts
12,527
Likes
16,880
What is the reference of no.3 here? Love that case. 8352 doesn’t seem to return useful results.
It should. I have one of these. You should be able to find it on this forum.


gatorcpa
 
Posts
346
Likes
286
356 is a unique case number within the reference 5863. It is not connected to the serial number.

I thought the unique case number went on the underside of one of the lugs? At least, that's been the case (pun not intended) with every Swiss cased Longines I've had (admittedly a rather small sample). Unique case number on a lug, and last portion of the movement serial inside the caseback under the reference number.
 
Posts
2,753
Likes
4,806
I thought the unique case number went on the underside of one of the lugs?
Certain references have a unique case number on the underside of one lug that matches a number on the case-back.
and last portion of the movement serial inside the caseback under the reference number.
This is incorrect.
 
Posts
7,639
Likes
26,477
That’s a beaut. Don’t see a double signed Longines everyday. 12.68 @Tony C.?

Thanks! It's a 23m, very clean, and from the early '40s.

And I agree that double-signed Longines are uncommon.