Forums Latest Members
  1. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    But not just any Ultra Chron...one of the relatively rare chronometer versions. I hate doing the tease with the unveiling, so let's get right to the point:

    [​IMG]

    It is one of the more uncommon 18K gold versions. Not too many around. In fact, the only other one I could find with the same dial was in this Japanese catalog from 1972:

    Capture.JPG

    If we have Japanese speakers in the audience today, I'd love to know what that means. I did a historical exchange rate analysis and it came out to about $2,100 in '72. But that included a gold band. There was another version of this case reference in the same catalog, priced at about $900 on a leather band. What I can't tell is whether the dial is also solid gold. It is gold in color, with either onyx or painted markers. It was certainly intended to be a competitor to the Omega Constellations and Rolex Oyster Perpetuals of that time.

    Movement is the cal. 431 high-beat

    [​IMG]

    Watch is in pretty good condition overall. Running at +5/sec a day. I'll leave it alone until the next service.

    [​IMG]

    The crown looks to be the correct type, but not signed. I think I've found an OEM replacement for a reasonable price at CousinsUK, but I've asked Longines for the dimensions to be sure.

    I'll post again when I've receive the particulars from Longines. Absolutely outstanding people to deal with.
    gatorcpa
     
    NT931, barmy, Andsan and 6 others like this.
  2. JohnSteed Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    Great get!! Nice!!

    :thumbsup:
     
  3. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    8,728
    Likes
    69,016
    Haven't seen one like it... sweet!:D
     
  4. ulackfocus Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    Score! The only other 18k model like this I've seen was from a South American seller who several members had problems with (including me) so I can't even say if it was a franken or a redial. Yours looks excellent though!
     
  5. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    7,385
    Likes
    24,201
    Nice. Congratulations.

    I'm dubious about the crown being original, but it's not a model line that I have focussed on.

    While this one is steel, I believe that the smaller crown is a hint to what may be correct for yours:

    [​IMG]

    and another steel one that sold in 2011:

    http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/fs...chron-automatic-chronometer-watch-489012.html

    Here's a slightly different case version, sold a long time ago at a now defunct Japanese dealer:

    http://www.i-dsw.com/horidashi/LONGINES/ULTRA/ULTRA.htm
     
  6. Hijak Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    Gator My Ultra-Chron has a very similar crown to yours but mine is signed.
    Longines Ultra-Chron Cal. 431, 1967, 4.jpg
     
  7. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    I'm 99.9% sure it's not original also. Waiting for Longines to get back to me.

    In the meantime, I couldn't resist the urge to make sure the reference was correct.

    [​IMG]

    Yeah, I think it's good.
    gatorcpa
     
  8. pitpro Likes the game. Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    3,073
    Likes
    3,552
    Nice one!
    I have the Ultra Chron itch too.
    Been looking for a steel C case
     
  9. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    Check your PM.
    gatorcpa
     
  10. citizenrich Metal Mixer! Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    2,617
    Likes
    5,515
    Those c cases or cushion cases (which one would this be considered?) are hefty in SS. lots of metal. I would imagine a SG 18k case must be serious heavy metal.

    I bet these are really rare. Probably less than 1:50 made were SG.
     
  11. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    This would be a cushion case. Dennis has a "C" case version in steel. You can search it out here.
    gatorcpa
     
  12. ulackfocus Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972

    One in steel, one in 18k pink gold. On the left is a 1970 18ct Ultra-Chron 8382A caliber 431. On the right is a 1973 ss Ultra-Chron 8355-3 caliber 6651.

    IMG_UCs.jpg
     
  13. citizenrich Metal Mixer! Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    2,617
    Likes
    5,515
    Begs the question...? Where do you prefer the date complication - @ 4:30 or 6:00 ??

    I don't think I really have a preference - both those watches look really nice.

    * edit - sry 'bout that - my iPhone is really spazzing out...


     
  14. ulackfocus Oct 30, 2014

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972

    6 is the most readable and best balanced presentation. However, as a Longines collector I want as much variety as possible - having one example of every automatic caliber. The only date-at-6 caliber I'm aware of is the 341 which usually came inside a Grand Prize or a non-series watch..... but I have already a 341 inside an even rarer date-at-12 Flagship. I'd love to know for certain if the later version 343 offered it too, and I vaguely remember one from years ago, but it might have been a franken because the 343 and 345 had larger date windows and I distinctly remember the normal size date window on the watch from back then (which is why I passed on it).

    The 4:30 date window plus the chronometer rating for a caliber 6651 made this a must-have for my collection since I didn't have either. It was just icing on the cake that it's a 37-ish mm C-case. ::jumpy::

    Now let's get back to ogling Evan's watch.
     
  15. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Oct 31, 2014

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    Did anyone here snag this one?

    Dirt cheap and and plenty of room to have serviced and get your money back later.
    gatorcpa
     
    Edited by a mod Jun 1, 2023
  16. Hijak Oct 31, 2014

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    ::blowup::...no, not me...if I'd seen it would have snapped that up though. Congratulations to whoever did, great buy!:thumbsup:
     
  17. JohnSteed Oct 31, 2014

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    :p My search somehow doesn't seem to include the U-Cs. Man!!! It will now..

    Hope the buyer is an OF member
     
  18. bill5959 Oct 31, 2014

    Posts
    598
    Likes
    361

    I just go crazy over these markings showing the gold content. If you want know if the dial is gold, I suggest you just (gator) bite it :taunt: It worked in the Westerns. Nice grab. Regards. Bill
     
  19. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 7, 2014

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    Just heard back from Longines regarding the watch, here's what they have to say:


    Dear Mr XXXX,
    We thank you for your message.
    Further to your request, we are pleased to provide the information contained in Longines' registers.

    1. Originally, the serial number 50'331'324 identifies a wristwatch in gold 18K bearing the reference 8352. It is fitted with a Longines mechanical self-winding movement, caliber 431. It was invoiced in 1969 to the company Longines-Wittnauer, which was at that time our agent in New York.

    2-3. The dial is not made of solid gold and the gold-colored portions of the Longines Chronometer movement are gold-plated.

    Remainder edited for relevancy....

    Truly yours,
    LONGINES
    Brand Heritage

    [​IMG]
     
  20. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Nov 7, 2014

    Posts
    7,385
    Likes
    24,201
    Thanks – quite useful information. If I were rich, I'd send Longines a big fat check in appreciation of their superior customer service (as it relates to the historical department).