Radiumpassion
·Would you agree that I shouldn’t touch the dial?
I think everyone that has responded to this thread would agree, including me.
Thank you for sharing this watct, it`s very interesting👍
Would you agree that I shouldn’t touch the dial?
@Radiumpassion has already responded what everyone would respond regarding the dial. It is beautiful and if you touch it you will destroy the beauty and value of the watch.
I came across a ‘Gold Mine’…..Pateck watch company seems to be the originator of this style watch and maybe Longines was just testing a copy of the Pateck watch.
Would you agree that I shouldn’t touch the dial?
Then as now, the watch business was a very “copycat” enterprise. One reason for this is that there were relatively few families involved in the upper eschelons of watchmaking, especially in Switzerland, and members of these families were scattered throughout many Swiss companies.
What tended to happen is that some smart person invented a new innovation (whether working for a company or not), patented the new design, and licensed it to watch companies and/or watch case manufacturers. Sometimes the inventors were individuals or smaller watch companies who sold or licensed these patents to larger companies. The Reverso is a good example of this. I believe these angled watch cases also came about using this model.
You also need to remember that in those days watch companies generally did not manufacture their own watch cases. Even Patek did not make their own cases. They were contract manufactured by many specialty companies.
So the way to research who “invented” or was the first to manufacture these angled watch cases would be to research Swiss or American patent records, not by looking at auction results.
The Patek Philippe watches you cited seemed to have been produced in the late 1930’s at the same time as the others.
gatorcpa