Let’s see your “jumbo” beefy lug Seamasters

Posts
3,219
Likes
12,674
Here is the final result 🥰

Shoutout to @MtV for helping me find new ss case! ::rimshot::

My pleasure - the result is mega!
 
Posts
840
Likes
3,382
All of the chronometre seamaster with the jumbo case (36.5 mm excluding the crown) in my collection.😀


My wrist shot:


Best,
Teerapat
 
Posts
22
Likes
76
Chanced on this thread, and thought I'd post my 166.011 from 1963 that I purchased here on OF. It gets a lot of wrist time : )
Edited:
 
Posts
1,616
Likes
6,834
My new Bumper Ref. 2657. What puzzles me is the combination. The dial looks quite modern, like made in the 60s. The Geiger also is silent, so the lume is Tritium for sure. The movement, is a Cal 28.10 with a serial 10.273.xxx that would indicate the year 1944. The watch looks unworn, but the numbers don't match in my opinion (old movement, modern dial). Any Ideas?

 
Posts
2,581
Likes
6,656
My new Bumper Ref. 2657. What puzzles me is the combination. The dial looks quite modern, like made in the 60s. The Geiger also is silent, so the lume is Tritium for sure. The movement, is a Cal 28.10 with a serial 10.273.xxx that would indicate the year 1944. The watch looks unworn, but the numbers don't match in my opinion (old movement, modern dial). Any Ideas?

1944 movement would be from a different watch. Dial is redial or service dial but could be correct for the case, though that marker style is uncommon.
 
Posts
3,219
Likes
12,674
Best case scenario it’s a service dial. Definitely not period correct, sunburst finish didn’t exist till later that decade.

edit: @seekingseaquest beat me to it.
 
Posts
1,616
Likes
6,834
https://www.ebay.de/itm/226047891871

here is a similar one, but with center second and the addition '61 in the caseback. Could this be the hint to a year? But same question here, early movement (10.9xx.xxx serial) and later look.

s-l500.jpg
s-l500.jpg
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.