Ok, just a little update
The unusual marks inside the case are similar but not identical to some I’ve seen in other Swiss cases such as Movado though as stated not identical so not conclusive.
I decided to contact David Boettcher FBHI to see if he could shed any light on the case.
For those of you not familiar with David, here is a link to his very informative website
https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/casemarks.php
To reiterate I could not understand why this watch WAS imported into France as a complete watch, not as a raw movement. After some correspondence sending images of the case and movement and waiting for a response I eventually received a reply from David confirming that “the case would have been made in Switzerland” 😀
Now, I know it’s not signed Omega but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that the case maker wasn’t obligated to stamp Omega into the case at that time. We are talking circa 1948/9 and it is well documented that Dennison and at least one other Omega contracted maker (JPB) didn’t stamp their cases Omega during this period.
As David is a leading authority in this field I’m happy with his assessment.
As a footnote I would add that the quality of the case is as good as any other Omega case of the period. The design is similar/identical ?? to the 2609/2181 Jumbo references, it’s just not stamped as such. Still a 100% original Bobby Dazzler though ...
View attachment 1159332
David Boettscher is recognized as an authority on the history of Francois Borgel cases and the Taubert cases that followed them, as well as with regards to trench watches and British market watches.
But while his interest may be very broad I’ve never heard of him being authoritative on anything related to the French market, he’s an enthusiast just like many people here and I don’t see why he’d be more of an authority than anyone here on cases imported from Switzerland into France.
@François Pépin being a French collector of Omega watches, I’d find him more, or at the very least equally qualified.
Hi @Flip
Well the good thing is your watch is being fully documented in this thread. For other who might know more can add additional info.
If you want to know more about your watch. I would try to get an extract using just the movement serial number if that is possible. Then you might know when and what condition it left Bienne... ( caseed or sold as movemement and dial etc...).
Good Hunting
Bill
As a French person who’s seen a good number of French hallmarks, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind the hallmark at the back is a French 18K eagle head hallmark.
David Boettscher is recognized as an authority on the history of Francois Borgel cases and the Taubert cases that followed them, as well as with regards to trench watches and British market watches.
But while his interest may be very broad I’ve never heard of him being authoritative on anything related to the French market, he’s an enthusiast just like many people here and I don’t see why he’d be more of an authority than anyone here on cases imported from Switzerland into France.
@François Pépin being a French collector of Omega watches, I’d find him more, or at the very least equally qualified.
Hello,
I do not know David Boettcher, and I do not wish to question his authority. I would be glad to see the examples he used to frame his analysis. But I do not agree at all to his and your conclusions.
The 750 with this kind of geometric figure can be found in Swiss made cases, but also in South America's and others. And in Swiss cases, it is usually much better done - compare for instance with the pic posted by Hoipolloi. Moreover, in a 18K gold case of that period, there should be a Helvetica. I do not have the knowledge to say it was absolutley mandatory, but in my exeprience it is clear that this case is not Swiss made. I do not see any reason to think it is, except your wish to have a very particular watch (which I understand!).
I will add that a 1940's Omega with a Swiss gold, non Omega signed, case in unheard of... Which, in that circumstances, does not mean it is rare, but that it does not exist! The comparison with Dennison's cases is irrelevant as they were not Swiss made. The last option I could be that it is some kind of unauthorised (or not fully authorized) Swiss gold production. But why on earth considering such a weird conclusion as others are much relevant?
Sorry again for the bad news. I may be wrong of course, but I think all I said is pretty well founded.
Cheers,
François
As a French person who’s seen a good number of French hallmarks, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind the hallmark at the back is a French 18K eagle head hallmark.
I’m happy to be proven wrong but the picture above is blown up to the point there is no resolution left. when it’s not blown up and with no distortion, I don’t see an oval at all.
maybe I’m blind...but I clearly see the shape of an eagle head with its curved bill sticking out.
There’s a depression around the print but unless you can take a picture with a loupe that will show an owl in an oval, I only see a shape that’s consistent with a printed eagle head.
For adding info, Universal Geneve cases were made with original stamp and without reference number for Spain and Argentina.
I don’t think that picture helps especially as you are looking at it from the wrong angle ! The eagle head faces to the right anyway not left as that image suggests.
Anyway, someone kindly gave me the instruction on how to photograph correctly through a loop ...View attachment 1159729
Like I said, it’s an Owl
So this Owl hallmark proves without any doubt that this case is not French, nor was it imported as a raw movement into France, it was imported as a complete watch, from a non treaty country, with the gold meeting France’s strict standards. This also proves it was not made for the French Market, so why was it imported into France ?
Thanks for the heads up 😀 Any photo examples you can share ? Obviously I should extend my searches across other Swiss brands. 👍