JAMES BOND EDITION 2026

Posts
2
Likes
2
Overall, the new blue Bond edition doesn’t really appeal to me, whereas I do like the black Spectre one:


1. The blue Bond

I think that the combination of blue and metal works well, and this dark blue —similar to the 60th Anniversary model— is elegant and attractive. However, I don’t like the bezel. Its rough texture looks rather coarse and unrefined to me, despite being titanium. By comparison, the titanium on the NTTD manages to look both refined and modern.

I’m also not keen on the Bond family coat of arms at 12 o’clock. Nobody, not even Bond fans, really associates that crest with 007. I might have preferred a gun-barrel pattern on the dial instead of the waves, as on the platinum-gold version, even if it were a simpler interpretation.

The caseback feels like a missed opportunity. Why do you have a display and open backsiee if you then obscure almost the entire movement? I would have loved something along the lines of the 60th Anniversary caseback, with an animated efect—perhaps a different design, but still an animation.

Between the new blue Bond and the blue 60th Anniversary model, I would choose the 60th Anniversary without hesitation.


2. The black Spectre

To my eye, this is clearly the more successful design. My two most obvious reservations are the absence of waves —or another pattern, perhaps suggesting the octopus’s tentacles, as on the platinum-gold version— and the rough texture of the bezel. That said, the texture works much better aesthetically in black than it does on the metallic bezel of the blue Bond. Perhaps a polished black ceramic bezel with polished raised numerals, something in the spirit of the Yacht-Master, would have worked very well. Overall, though, the combination of black dial and black bezel is convincing, without going as far as the Seamaster Diver 300M Black Black.

My main criticism of the new Spectre is undoubtedly the caseback: it lacks subtlety. Would a smaller Spectre emblem, leaving more of the movement visible, have been so difficult? Better still, an animated sequence in which the Spectre logo gradually appeared, or something along those lines.

To me, subtlety is part of elegance. An oversized, conspicuous logo feels intrusive rather than refined.



So, this time, I prefer Spectre to Bond. Among the Bond-related models, my shortlist would now be the new Diver 300M Spectre, the 60th Anniversary and the NTTD, whose colour scheme I find both modern and elegant. And, of course, the original Seamaster 300 Spectre, with its vintage styling.
 
Posts
3
Likes
1
These watches are pretty disappointing. I don’t like either of them. I’ve been waiting for a properly redesigned SMP 300, but Omega just keeps making a couple of tweaks and releasing them as special models. The thickness is another problem. I honestly don’t understand why they won’t slim this design down or how the people in charge keep signing off on watches this thick. Omega really needs to stop pumping out endless references and focus on making the watches thinner.
 
Posts
1,004
Likes
1,820
I'd like to see that dial in person, looks like a trip
There's a few shots on this instagram reel of both limited editions but nothing that captures any real mesmerising movement on the dials, that I do hope is there.
Lots of chopping and changing in these reels but this one isn't as fast/bad as the official Omega release video and site which actually makes me feel sick.
 
Posts
98
Likes
225
This looks far better than the bland mesh bracelet.
It does. Still don't like the bezel, though.
 
Posts
32
Likes
96
I'm a big James Bond fan and I love Omega. Personally, I think the Bond branded watches are a bit silly. If I am spending 10K or more on a watch, I don't want the branding of a fictional character all over it. I love the look of the commander watch, but the 007 logo second hand kills it for me.
 
Posts
9
Likes
12
Still not sure why people believed Omega would release a totally redesigned Seamaster for Bond day? I mean I get not liking the design of these watches but think people had some unrealistic expectations for this release.

Looking at some of the other Bond themed watches I think this Spectre model is more attractive IMHO ( outside the NTTD and the Spectre limited ).
 
Posts
46
Likes
24
AI for sure. Getting harder to tell every day though...
That account only uses AI, it's awful
 
Posts
31
Likes
363
I don't think Omega listens to anyone who actually wears watches.

I realize chasing every complaint is impossible, but there is an undeniable clamor for a Seamaster 300m that is smaller in diameter and thickness. Look at the success Tudor has had with the Black Bay 58 (39mm) and Black Bay 54 (37mm). There is a market that is totally unfilled by Omega. I'm not asking them to eliminate the 42mm 300m, I'm asking them to offer a smaller size (38mm or 39mm) like Longines does for the Hydroconquest and like Omega did before 2018.
Well, I think the frustration goes beyond the Seamaster.

I think there is a rather strange disconnect between Omega’s portfolio and what a large part of the market has been asking for some time now: fewer but better resolved designs (please no more lazy releases), and more broadly wearable dimensions. I reckon that shouldn’t be so hard to fix.

Honestly, I often like to imagine Tudor and Longines leadership getting the popcorn out every time Omega announces a launch. I cannot understand why Omega has been, for years, simply dismissing a very obvious part of the market.
 
Posts
46
Likes
24
Well, I think the frustration goes beyond the Seamaster.

I think there is a rather strange disconnect between Omega’s portfolio and what a large part of the market has been asking for some time now: fewer but better resolved designs (please no more lazy releases), and more broadly wearable dimensions. I reckon that shouldn’t be so hard to fix.

Honestly, I often like to imagine Tudor and Longines leadership getting the popcorn out every time Omega announces a launch. I cannot understand why Omega has been, for years, simply dismissing a very obvious part of the market.
I think they're trying to stretch out all remaining parts/stock of this generation Seamaster Diver until they completely revamp the Diver 300M line, kind of like they did with the 4th-gen Planet Ocean. They'd probably make it a 40-41mm size to have the PO occupy the 42mm spot and hopefully they reduce the thickness as well, something like the NTTD at ~12.9mm
 
Posts
2
Likes
2
Overall, the new blue Bond edition doesn’t really appeal to me, whereas I do like the black Spectre one:


1. The blue Bond

I think that the combination of blue and metal works well, and this dark blue —similar to the 60th Anniversary model— is elegant and attractive. However, I don’t like the bezel. Its rough texture looks rather coarse and unrefined to me, despite being titanium. By comparison, the titanium on the NTTD manages to look both refined and modern.

I’m also not keen on the Bond family coat of arms at 12 o’clock. Nobody, not even Bond fans, really associates that crest with 007. I might have preferred a gun-barrel pattern on the dial instead of the waves, as on the platinum-gold version, even if it were a simpler interpretation.

The caseback feels like a missed opportunity. Why do you have a display and open backsiee if you then obscure almost the entire movement? I would have loved something along the lines of the 60th Anniversary caseback, with an animated efect—perhaps a different design, but still an animation.

Between the new blue Bond and the blue 60th Anniversary model, I would choose the 60th Anniversary without hesitation.


2. The black Spectre

To my eye, this is clearly the more successful design. My two most obvious reservations are the absence of waves —or another pattern, perhaps suggesting the octopus’s tentacles, as on the platinum-gold version— and the rough texture of the bezel. That said, the texture works much better aesthetically in black than it does on the metallic bezel of the blue Bond. Perhaps a polished black ceramic bezel with polished raised numerals, something in the spirit of the Yacht-Master, would have worked very well. Overall, though, the combination of black dial and black bezel is convincing, without going as far as the Seamaster Diver 300M Black Black.

My main criticism of the new Spectre is undoubtedly the caseback: it lacks subtlety. Would a smaller Spectre emblem, leaving more of the movement visible, have been so difficult? Better still, an animated sequence in which the Spectre logo gradually appeared, or something along those lines.

To me, subtlety is part of elegance. An oversized, conspicuous logo feels intrusive rather than refined.



So, this time, I prefer Spectre to Bond. Among the Bond-related models, my shortlist would now be the new Diver 300M Spectre, the 60th Anniversary and the NTTD, whose colour scheme I find both modern and elegant. And, of course, the original Seamaster 300 Spectre, with its vintage styling.

I’ve just visited today an Omega boutique, and seeing both watches in person:

I disappoint to the new blue-Bond model after my visit: the textured titanium bezel is shinier than I expected, and the Bond family coat of arms at 12 is too prominent.

However, the black-Spectre model was a very pleasant surprise in person: the bezel is less grainy than photographs in a greyish tone (not too black) and feels sportier than a conventional black ceramic bezel. Likewise, the grainy texture of the dial is very subtle and barely noticeable.


I really liked the black-Spectre model on my wrist, but the new blue-Bond one did absolutely nothing for me. For a blue Bond watch, I would definitely choose the 60th Anniversary. Black-Spectre could be my next SMP Diver 300.

Sorry I didn’t take any wrist shots.
 
Posts
15
Likes
5
Honestly, I often like to imagine Tudor and Longines leadership getting the popcorn out every time Omega announces a launch.
They aren't in the same league as Omega, so there's no point in wishful thinking—this isn't a YouTube comments section.
 
Posts
943
Likes
5,124
They aren't in the same league as Omega, so there's no point in wishful thinking—this isn't a YouTube comments section.
You might be right, but as an owner of three Tudor Blackbays they're solid timepieces and perform flawlessly. I don't really see a reason to defend the brand beyond my experience because they speak for themselves among watch enthusiasts. The issue I'm having is that I don’t see anything in the current Omega catalog that moves the needle far enough for me to buy another one. Will that change in the future, probably so. In the end, we all get to vote with our hearts and wallets. Hopefully, my comment isn't a YouTube level comment. 😂
 
Posts
2,416
Likes
11,489
You might be right, but as an owner of three Tudor Blackbays they're solid timepieces and perform flawlessly. I don't really see a reason to defend the brand beyond my experience because they speak for themselves among watch enthusiasts. The issue I'm having is that I don’t see anything in the current Omega catalog that moves the needle far enough for me to buy another one. Will that change in the future, probably so. In the end, we all get to vote with our hearts and wallets. Hopefully, my comment isn't a YouTube level comment. 😂
I have seven Omegas and a Black bay Chrono. I love them all.
 
Posts
751
Likes
1,754
These watches are pretty disappointing. I don’t like either of them. I’ve been waiting for a properly redesigned SMP 300, but Omega just keeps making a couple of tweaks and releasing them as special models. The thickness is another problem. I honestly don’t understand why they won’t slim this design down or how the people in charge keep signing off on watches this thick. Omega really needs to stop pumping out endless references and focus on making the watches thinner.

I suspect they do have a new gen SMP in the works which is hopefully, suuurely, thinner and smaller. But that costs a lot, so as GT3RS already said, they're just trying to squeeze the most life and money they can out of the old gen with all these parts bin specials which are mostly just redials. I think it's short sighted as the brand perception is being tarnished a bit, but I don't know how much that actually translates to sales impact.

The issue I'm having is that I don’t see anything in the current Omega catalog that moves the needle far enough for me to buy another one. Will that change in the future, probably so. In the end, we all get to vote with our hearts and wallets. Hopefully, my comment isn't a YouTube level comment. 😂

I'm in this boat as well. I love my existing Omegas, but a lot of their recent models are worse than their older ones, in my personal opinion. The only watch in their lineup I think is the best it's ever been is the Speedy Pro, and I'm planning to pick one up as my next watch. Outside of that, nothing they've made has appealed to me enough to want to buy for many years.

Not to say they haven't made some cool watches in that time, NTTD is a great example. But that's a bit too niche for me to justify picking up, even though I think it's excellent. The base SMP this gen has never appealed to me like the older gens though.

The great thing about watches is they don't age quite the same as cars or other technology. Decades old models are perfectly viable for daily wear and Omega has an incredibly good back catalogue.
 
Posts
1,389
Likes
1,399
They aren't in the same league as Omega, so there's no point in wishful thinking—this isn't a YouTube comments section.
I own three Tudors that are in their current catalog and one vintage. I own more Omegas but only one is a current model. Everything else is 15 years old or older. So for me Tudor is doing a better job selling me new watches than Omega is.
 
Posts
45
Likes
34
Everybody is complaining that Omega doesn't listen to its customers, but I'm not sure that's us. Have you been to China? They love Omegas and I sometimes wonder if that is the reason for the designs we are still seeing.
 
Posts
129
Likes
396
EDIT: Hmm, just saw someone make a good point on Reddit that the black bezel one is basically a Yachtmaster.
That was my first reaction as well: 'hey, they made an Omega version of the Yachtmaster'.
 
Posts
2,412
Likes
2,707
I suspect they do have a new gen SMP in the works which is hopefully, suuurely, thinner and smaller. But that costs a lot, so as GT3RS already said, they're just trying to squeeze the most life and money they can out of the old gen with all these parts bin specials which are mostly just redials. I think it's short sighted as the brand perception is being tarnished a bit, but I don't know how much that actually translates to sales impact.
This is my thoughts exactly. It’s the one thing that’s stopping me purchasing the current no date monochrome Seamaster, whilst the size works for me, if it was a tad smaller and thinner it would be perfect especially with an updated tapering bracelet. However if/ when Omega revamp the Seamaster range I doubt they’ll be another no date monochrome version with a domed sapphire.

Also I daily flip flop between a Speedy or Seamaster
 
Posts
254
Likes
269
They aren't in the same league as Omega, so there's no point in wishful thinking—this isn't a YouTube comments section.

You're right. Longines has to give customers what they want, instead of telling them what they want
Sorry for the repost, but this is still valid.

That's not true.

Some times they make exactly what people might want, and price it at astronomical levels