JAMES BOND EDITION 2026

Posts
355
Likes
295
I find these rather disappointing and rather lazy on the part of Omega. The only minor highlight is the gun barrel pattern on the platinum models. Also, I know many love the mesh bracelets, but I hope this is not their plan going forward for the Seamaster line. I far prefer the standard bracelet both in looks and the fact that it has micro adjust.
I don’t even know who omega listens to because it’s always the ones who complain about watches being too thick or thin, 40mm or 44mm too big or small, no date, being symmetrical, etc, I mean we are being charged 8,600 usd for a 8806 movement at this rate 😭

Then at the end of the day, buy an Apple Watch Ultra 4 🤣
 
Posts
113
Likes
128
The bonus is two of watches, this is an afterthought but Rolex doesn’t sell you cufflinks either 🤷, omega missed the mark, rather than a bracelet it should had been a ring but getting it to fit universal sizes would be impossible.

Either way we will never see this in person, since they are 77 units only worldwide, talk about extremely limited.
These naff bracelets are also for sale individually: £320 for this one and £400 for the Bond version.
 
Posts
1,389
Likes
1,399
I don’t even know who omega listens to
I don't think Omega listens to anyone who actually wears watches.

I realize chasing every complaint is impossible, but there is an undeniable clamor for a Seamaster 300m that is smaller in diameter and thickness. Look at the success Tudor has had with the Black Bay 58 (39mm) and Black Bay 54 (37mm). There is a market that is totally unfilled by Omega. I'm not asking them to eliminate the 42mm 300m, I'm asking them to offer a smaller size (38mm or 39mm) like Longines does for the Hydroconquest and like Omega did before 2018.
 
Posts
5,114
Likes
15,815
I appreciate brands doing fun and quirky things…but these days i often scratch my head totally confused when it comes to Omega…
 
Posts
141
Likes
120
I’ll wait a little longer for a new diver 300, but it might be 39 mm hydroconquest instead
 
Posts
6,497
Likes
22,086
, I'm asking them to offer a smaller size (38mm or 39mm) like Longines does for the Hydroconquest
+1

Omega has to be feeling pressure from the hydroconquest. The new HC is hard to find in stock. Longines emailed an apology to dealers for not keeping up with demand. Omega is likely sending more customers to Longines.
 
Posts
6,680
Likes
11,631
It looks like Omega is looking to Zelos for dial design inspiration.
 
Posts
355
Likes
295
These naff bracelets are also for sale individually: £320 for this one and £400 for the Bond version.
The 007 version has sapphire crystal in the stainless steel?? I prefer sailing bracelets, I always feel like the knot from the naff cord will untie themselves, in the past they have but wouldn’t risk it with!



I think the one that comes with the watch is different however, but don’t know if we can’t see the back side of it.


I don't think Omega listens to anyone who actually wears watches.

I realize chasing every complaint is impossible, but there is an undeniable clamor for a Seamaster 300m that is smaller in diameter and thickness. Look at the success Tudor has had with the Black Bay 58 (39mm) and Black Bay 54 (37mm). There is a market that is totally unfilled by Omega. I'm not asking them to eliminate the 42mm 300m, I'm asking them to offer a smaller size (38mm or 39mm) like Longines does for the Hydroconquest and like Omega did before 2018.
Could had sworn that omega posted on social media about listening to “consumer” demand for smaller watches and made the 38”mm speedmaster or whatever. My first seamaster was the 36mm 300m and never liked the smaller design, however, like you mentioned omega should release new models in different sizes like they did in the past.
Edited:
 
Posts
98
Likes
225
Love my 300m but I'm very whelmed on both variations.

Would like to see what was left on the cutting room floor over these two.
 
Posts
2,701
Likes
3,022
I like the new releases except for the milanese bracelet. If you don't have the wrist for it, they're awful.

Given the choice of my 2220.80 or any of the 42mm Seamasters, I'd still go for the older version.
 
Posts
5,682
Likes
137,277
I'm not a huge fan of these but a buddy of mine used to be. Years ago I started a compilation to help him keep track, and then I just kept maintaining it. Just caught up with the new drops. I know, dart board material for many here...but cool for some. To each his own! 😎
Edited:
 
Posts
105
Likes
72
Could had sworn that omega posted on social media about listening to “consumer” demand for smaller watches and made the 38”mm speedmaster or whatever. My first seamaster was the 36mm 300m and never liked the smaller design, however, like you mentioned omega should release new models in different sizes like they did in the past.
If the 38mm speedmaster was Omega listening to fans advocating for smaller watches, then I'd recommend a hearing exam.
 
Posts
445
Likes
577
I only like the 3D dials and the bezel with raised numerals of the expensive ones.
I don’t like the basic ones.
Anyway, I could never wear something related to a fictional character like a fanboy!
 
Posts
943
Likes
5,124
I really like the blue dial version. The 12 marker is cool and I like the texture and look of the bezel and caseback/movement design. However, I won’t be a buyer because I already have a Seamaster 300M. As my taste has evolved I’ve moved on to other brands. If I were to buy another Omega, I would dip my toes into the vintage realm. So many great examples being sold by trusted OF members. At this point, I would rather buy the new Longines Hydroconquest (L3.788.4.99.6) and I've already registered for one on their website. Waiting...
 
Posts
98
Likes
225
I really like the blue dial version. The 12 marker is cool and I like the texture and look of the bezel and caseback/movement design. However, I won’t be a buyer because I already have a Seamaster 300M. As my taste has evolved I’ve moved on to other brands. If I were to buy another Omega, I would dip my toes into the vintage realm. So many great examples being sold by trusted OF members. At this point, I would rather buy the new Longines Hydroconquest (L3.788.4.99.6) and I've already registered for one on their website. Waiting...
Was offered to come in and buy the black one. I guess I'll go in but I don't really want it. Maybe I'll change my mind once I see it up close. Doubt it, though.
 
Posts
751
Likes
1,754
I don't think Omega listens to anyone who actually wears watches.

I realize chasing every complaint is impossible, but there is an undeniable clamor for a Seamaster 300m that is smaller in diameter and thickness. Look at the success Tudor has had with the Black Bay 58 (39mm) and Black Bay 54 (37mm). There is a market that is totally unfilled by Omega. I'm not asking them to eliminate the 42mm 300m, I'm asking them to offer a smaller size (38mm or 39mm) like Longines does for the Hydroconquest and like Omega did before 2018.

I've been pretty vocal about this myself, I think there has been a perception that only enthusiasts care about this or that but I think this does ultimately negatively affect their market perception to the general public.

Omega have traditionally pushed a marketing angle of being innovative, especially with their movement technology. Spirate seems to be dead in the water and the continually bloated case sizes have caused a negative general perception that the co-axial technology makes the watches too big. Continuing to release chunky parts bin specials of a design from 2018, in my opinion, damages the brand long term for minimal short term gain.
The new gen PO did slim down a bit and looks pretty fresh design wise, so I still have some hope Omega do understand this and are just taking their time getting it right. But we need a new SMP generation soon and it really, really needs to go back to being sleek again. The target should be no less than Rolex Submariner beating specifications.

I'm not a huge fan of these but a buddy of mine used to be. Years ago I started a compilation to help him keep track, and then I just kept maintaining it. Just caught up with the new drops. I know, dart board material for many here...but cool for some. To each his own! 😎

This is really cool, I hadn't seen quite a few of these before. That Goldfinger full gold AT is pretty cool! I also didn't realise the 12 o'clock marker on the new blue one is also a parts bin design from 2019. I thought that was new.

On a positive note, someone has already bought the new blue variant and put it on the OEM rubber. I actually don't mind it in that configuration. Suits it a lot better than the mesh. The same comment thread has an AI rendering of the black variant on black rubber, which looks like it would look better as well.

 
Posts
285
Likes
426
I've been pretty vocal about this myself, I think there has been a perception that only enthusiasts care about this or that but I think this does ultimately negatively affect their market perception to the general public.

Omega have traditionally pushed a marketing angle of being innovative, especially with their movement technology. Spirate seems to be dead in the water and the continually bloated case sizes have caused a negative general perception that the co-axial technology makes the watches too big. Continuing to release chunky parts bin specials of a design from 2018, in my opinion, damages the brand long term for minimal short term gain.
The new gen PO did slim down a bit and looks pretty fresh design wise, so I still have some hope Omega do understand this and are just taking their time getting it right. But we need a new SMP generation soon and it really, really needs to go back to being sleek again. The target should be no less than Rolex Submariner beating specifications.



This is really cool, I hadn't seen quite a few of these before. That Goldfinger full gold AT is pretty cool! I also didn't realise the 12 o'clock marker on the new blue one is also a parts bin design from 2019. I thought that was new.

On a positive note, someone has already bought the new blue variant and put it on the OEM rubber. I actually don't mind it in that configuration. Suits it a lot better than the mesh. The same comment thread has an AI rendering of the black variant on black rubber, which looks like it would look better as well.

This looks far better than the bland mesh bracelet.