Great looking IWC! The hands have slots for lume but the dial has no lume. Does that suggest a redial or replaced hands? I also am gathering info on these dials.
That reference 1832 (right side 2nd down) is an original dial?
Ima say it again: IWC outsourced to different dial manufacturers during the early/mid-20th century, and the signatures are not perfectly consistent. Sometimes the desire to detect redials can lead to missing the forest for the trees.
Ima say it again: IWC outsourced to different dial manufacturers during the early/mid-20th century, and the signatures are not perfectly consistent. Sometimes the desire to detect redials can lead to missing the forest for the trees.
@MPWATCH recently posted an excellent example of what I mean by the ink being rounded. You can see the depth it has due to the reflections on the sides: