It’s here!: Railmaster Coaxial 2403

pIoNeErOfThEnILe

i can't even tell which is the 36 and which is the 39 on your wrist.

the only time i see the size difference is when the two watches are next to one another.

does this watch wear big?

what is the 36 and 39 L2L?

padders

The 39mm wears massive because it is all dial, the 41mm is just too big, as for the 49mm, dont go there unless you are Flavor Flave.

pIoNeErOfThEnILe

i'm still researching this

the 36mm is actually 35.5 & 43.50 lug to lug <<<<<<that is pretty small imo

the 39mm is 39mm and 47mm lug to lug

as to the 39 wearing big. i guess because the dial is huge it wears bigger? it doesn't look awkward at all in the pics.

generally, whenever i see any pic of any watch up close the watch looks bigger than it is. and when it's a distance shot it looks smaller. this is very deceiving as you could easily say the watch looks too big with close up pic

fskywalker

I measured my 2504.52 and the lug to lug size is 44 mm while the 39 mm 2503.52 was 46 mm. The 39 mm 2503.52 is actually as long as a 41 mm Seamaster 2254, so pretty long for a 39 mm watch.

pIoNeErOfThEnILe

my sinn 556 is all dial as well and it's 38.5 and 45mm L2L

i would even say this watch wears smaller than the dimensions indicate on a 7" wrist even with a dial that's in your face.

pIoNeErOfThEnILe

i'm now seeing that somebody reported that the 39mm is actually a shade bigger @ 39.2...ugghhhhh

this version is more readily available and much less expensive than the 36mm.

if the 39mm watch isn't awkward on, saving around 1k over the perceived rarity of the 36mm has to trump things for me.

my naked thoughts are the 39mm should be fine and the 36mm might be just a little too small with the specs i see

thing is i can't try it on before i buy............haha