fskywalker
·I had a 2503.52 about 3 years ago for a short time (flipped towards another watch wanted) and later the Rolex Explorer in both 39 (214270 MK1 with WG 3 6 9; first) and 36 mm sizes (114270; last), which left my collection when consolidated several pieces towards a Rolex WG Daydate 18239. Ever since had been looking at the various new iterations of the Railmaster (40 mm with brown, silver and denim dials and the 60th anniversary version) as well as the Rolex 214270 MK2 (lumed 3 6 9) as potential candidates for a "new" 3 6 9 watch, but none of them had, in my opinion, the charm (and the sleek / thin profile) of the older caliber 2403 series. I originally started to look for a 36 mm as wanted to try the smaller size this time (my wrist is 7 inches but pretty round) but since they are very hard to source decided to jump on a nice full set 2503.52 that recently became available. I'm very pleased to have a RM back on my rotation 😀, but since its arrival all my other watches are pissed! 😡
Here on its steel bracelet:
which was quickly (for now) replaced with an OEM Omega alligator band kept from my gone 2503.33.00 AT (which understand is the exact model used on the railmaster leather band version, 2803.52.37):
Lovely full lumed dial, which can't be matched by the Explorer 😉
I will keep looking for a 36 mm RM (2504.52) to compare sizes on my wrist, but pretty sure that a caliber 2403 RM will be on rotation for a long time 😀
Here on its steel bracelet:
which was quickly (for now) replaced with an OEM Omega alligator band kept from my gone 2503.33.00 AT (which understand is the exact model used on the railmaster leather band version, 2803.52.37):
Lovely full lumed dial, which can't be matched by the Explorer 😉
I will keep looking for a 36 mm RM (2504.52) to compare sizes on my wrist, but pretty sure that a caliber 2403 RM will be on rotation for a long time 😀
Edited:










