- Posts
- 20
- Likes
- 0
I don't like the dial. For a start a -61 iteration would not have T marks since tritium wasn't used until 62-63 and not marked for the first year. The markers are blocky and seem misaligned too. In short its perhaps not as original as you may have hoped.
I guess it depends on the description.
I wholeheartedly against dodgy sellers being economic with the truth and taking advanced of new collectors by creatively describing refinished dials as “original but restored”.
However, I also think buyers should be responsible and not buy a watch, then ask questions afterwards, potentially messing around an innocent and well meaning seller. Due diligence should be done before you purchase.
So, it’s subjective but my opinion is if this was bought as seen and the seller didn’t claim the dial was original or use any creating language, I think it’s the noob tax most of us pay. If it was claimed to be original etc, I’d certainly return it.
S Sam909Thanks for your kind reply; it was mentioned not customized in the description and no information that it is reprinted.
Good luck, this sounds like a big stretch. The seller was honest, IMO. It's not reasonable to expect every casual seller to be capable of distinguishing subtle issues like an old redial or replaced crown. eBay is an electronic garage sale where all types of items are sold. Many sellers are not experts, and many buyers are happy to get an item they find appealing at a low price. As long as the seller is honest, the responsibility is on the buyer to do some due diligence before bidding.
In this case, the seller described the item as well as he could and listed it in a no-reserve auction, allowing the item to find its market value. That seems totally fair to me. Make your argument to eBay, perhaps they will give you a refund for your buyer's remorse, but I don't think you'll get a lot of sympathy here.
S Sam909With all due respect, I do not care about money, and I do not know why saying I am searching for sympathy. According to the seller biography, the seller is an expert in vintage timepieces; he has completed thousands of transactions and even offers watch parts with full listings and prices, demonstrating his complete understanding of the business. I come here to learn from the expertise and respected members who have commented above and educated me, however you are aggressive for no reason. The seller must be regarded and moral, rather than simply deceiving. Even Omega Company purchased a fake watch from an auction, so how come fresh passionate people can spot every single flaw in a watch!!
I don't think Dan was being aggressive or disrespectful, it's just that the emphasis lies with you to do your research before bidding and as such coming here after the fact and now looking for a reason to return the watch seems a little off.
I'd say the majority of Ebay vintage watches are misdescribed in one way or another, that's why it can be either a pitfall or a paradise for a buyer.
Not sure why you feel the need to keep defending yourself. If you feel so justified, go ahead and do what you want to do. We gave you the information you wanted, but we don’t need to agree
Not sure why you feel the need to keep defending yourself. If you feel so justified, go ahead and do what you want to do. We gave you the information you wanted, but we don’t need to agree with your moral compass.