- Posts
- 18
- Likes
- 28
Is this a genuine dial
- Posts
- 13,483
- Likes
- 31,782
X350 XJR
··Vintage Omega AficionadoDial is a complete fantasy, not original.
- Posts
- 16,305
- Likes
- 45,005
JwRosenthal
·Watch may have been in the family since ‘66 but that dial hasn’t. If the seller is from the Far East- then even the story is probably a lie- these are very common redials and sadly sacrificed what could have been a nice watch.
- Posts
- 18
- Likes
- 28
tytim
·Thankyou I appreciate the comments.
- Posts
- 18
- Likes
- 28
tytim
·Hi, for my education can you highlight the (obvious to you guys) issues. I haqve messaged the seller (Ireland) who maintains its definately the original dial as purchased in 1966. heres a link to the ebay listing https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/283642339343?ul_noapp=true
Its a very long learning curve but you have to start somewhere 😀
Its a very long learning curve but you have to start somewhere 😀
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
- Posts
- 5,076
- Likes
- 15,698
DaveK
·Here’s the loophole: the dial might be original, but the paint is definitely not
- Posts
- 24,593
- Likes
- 54,620
- Posts
- 411
- Likes
- 626
river9
·To my untrained eye, is the bezel missing? Notice big gap between lugs and crystal.
- Posts
- 16,305
- Likes
- 45,005
JwRosenthal
·To my untrained eye, is the bezel missing? Notice big gap between lugs and crystal.
- Posts
- 2,214
- Likes
- 1,389
DON
·As mentioned. Dial design is not original nor is the color. If the caseback was off. You could see the reference number and match it up to other examples to see what it originally looked like.
Avoid. Especially at that ridiculous. It's a fantasy like that dial
DON
Further add
I also think the bezel might be missing. Just doesn't look right
Avoid. Especially at that ridiculous. It's a fantasy like that dial
DON
Further add
I also think the bezel might be missing. Just doesn't look right
Edited:
