- Posts
- 302
- Likes
- 4,001
Is it just me? Can you spot it too?
- Posts
- 1,314
- Likes
- 10,594
bigsom
·Looks totally aligned to me!
- Posts
- 214
- Likes
- 297
mr_smith
·I can't help but think about the parallax effect. Could it be due to the angle at which you are viewing it? Or, one eye sees it misaligned while it looks aligned to the other? To me, it looks aligned!
- Posts
- 649
- Likes
- 2,495
redzer007
·Looks off to me, but did not spot it till you pointed it out. Better pic would help and it's only marginal. But what I don't understand is, it the same dial? If so I'm.sire it came out the way it went in
- Posts
- 430
- Likes
- 397
ama98
·An hidden omega logo on the dial? (somewhere)
- Posts
- 269
- Likes
- 369
Sublime_1
·The out of sync minute and second hand would bother me more.
- Posts
- 763
- Likes
- 1,338
- Posts
- 269
- Likes
- 369
Sublime_1
·That's also what I noticed. If the seconds hand is at the top, why is the minute hand in the middle of the minute marker? I'm unfamiliar with Rolex watches, so I wasn't sure if that was normal or not.
- Posts
- 732
- Likes
- 2,970
robinhook
·Does anybody have a similar problem? Because its not as obvious on the picture as it is in real life! The watchmaker says it supposed to look like that? I dont know really? a watch that costs 9000 dollars should be flawless...
- Posts
- 4,544
- Likes
- 11,574
wagudc
·I can't help but think about the parallax effect. Could it be due to the angle at which you are viewing it? Or, one eye sees it misaligned while it looks aligned to the other? To me, it looks aligned!
I agree. It has to do with the three-dimensional aspect of the marker. These 3 photos show a representation of the situation. The green thing is like your marker and the red dot the crown. I took these three pictures by only moving the camera and nothing else was moved. Notice that dot is aligned in the straight on shot, but appears to be off center in the same way even when taking the picture from two different sides.
- Posts
- 1,790
- Likes
- 2,001
michael22
·Does anybody have a similar problem? Because its not as obvious on the picture as it is in real life! The watchmaker says it supposed to look like that? I dont know really? a watch that costs 9000 dollars should be flawless...
If the watchmaker really said what you wrote above, it implies he sees it.
Try taking a few photos from directly above, with different lighting. The current shot is mostly lit from one side, & the shadow makes it harder to judge.
- Posts
- 642
- Likes
- 1,999
- Posts
- 17,523
- Likes
- 26,477
- Posts
- 224
- Likes
- 248
many
·Does anybody have a similar problem? Because its not as obvious on the picture as it is in real life! The watchmaker says it supposed to look like that? I dont know really? a watch that costs 9000 dollars should be flawless...
As crazy as this sounds. According to some manufacturers a watch that costs $9,000, in some case should only look flawless from (IIRC) 3' or arm's length away.
If you want flawless closer than arm's length or maybe under a loupe the cost of the watch typically goes up considerably.
- Posts
- 6,749
- Likes
- 12,737
Evitzee
·Does anybody have a similar problem? Because its not as obvious on the picture as it is in real life! The watchmaker says it supposed to look like that? I dont know really? a watch that costs 9000 dollars should be flawless...
- Posts
- 214
- Likes
- 297
- Posts
- 1,076
- Likes
- 1,781
FREDMAYCOIN
·It is perfect and that blue dial.....unbelievable. Enjoy
- Posts
- 763
- Likes
- 1,338
- Posts
- 732
- Likes
- 2,970
robinhook
·I guess to clarify, shouldn't the minute hand be on the line vs. in between the line?
- Posts
- 17,523
- Likes
- 26,477
Foo2rama
··Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can.I guess to clarify, shouldn't the minute hand be on the line vs. in between the line?
I’m not picky when I set watches.
