- Posts
- 16,863
- Likes
- 47,901
Interesting trademark case...
- Posts
- 3,184
- Likes
- 3,856
SpikiSpikester
··@ ΩFHe just asked about one watch on EBay .........Need a thread with a few of them.
Get the Omega Milsub presence out there 😉
Very much sounds like you've already volunteered 😜
- Posts
- 16,307
- Likes
- 44,994
JwRosenthal
·He just asked about one watch on EBay .........Need a thread with a few of them.
Get the Omega Milsub presence out there 😉
- Posts
- 3,998
- Likes
- 9,018
cvalue13
·I find it odd that this Kiger guy gets qualified as the hero against the villain, he basically builds a submariner hommage watch (*cough “copy” *cough), invents the Tag Heuer logo to say Kiger, trademarks a rather commonly used term associated with well known watch names, and has some sort of journalist write a story about his fights...
Shady practice on all acounts really
for a most part, a +1 here
are people so accepting of the guy who trademarked “NATO”?
seems that should face genericide, too
- Posts
- 6,832
- Likes
- 13,797
Nobel Prize
·for a most part, a +1 here
are people so accepting of the guy who trademarked “NATO”?
seems that should face genericide, too
to be enforced
- Posts
- 247
- Likes
- 232
- Posts
- 444
- Likes
- 751
- Posts
- 328
- Likes
- 244
Rado63
·Interesting to me, that we read Rolex isn't trying to trademark this term "Mil Sub" in any other country. My thought is the term "Mil Sub" is too generic too even have a trademark. Perhaps in the US , where someone already has trademarked the term "Mil Sub", the Rolex petition could get the trademark nullified as being generic and then they could make their "Milsub" Tudors or whatever it is they have in mind without any trademark infringements in any country.
- Posts
- 3,958
- Likes
- 11,041
Waltesefalcon
·One of the things I love about this forum is that no one is giving themselves an aneurysm over the US Navy finding Rolex's offering to of unacceptable quality and utility.
- Posts
- 247
- Likes
- 232
sgrenald
·Mean
Meanwhile, over on the Rolex discussion website:
One of the things I love about this forum is that no one is giving themselves an aneurysm over the US Navy finding Rolex's offering to of unacceptable quality and utility.
Meanwhile, over on the Rolex discussion website:
- Posts
- 16,307
- Likes
- 44,994
JwRosenthal
·One of the things I love about this forum is that no one is giving themselves an aneurysm over the US Navy finding Rolex's offering to of unacceptable quality and utility.
Suck my Seawolf, Rolex!
- Posts
- 153
- Likes
- 976
crl848
·It’s been said elsewhere (and nothing to do with trademarks), but IMO a milsub is a Rolex military submariner. Collector usage for other military dive watches is just lazy and wrong 😗
Similar threads
- Posts
- 8
- Views
- 294
- Posts
- 7
- Views
- 256
- Posts
- 2
- Views
- 459
- Posts
- 0
- Views
- 481
- Posts
- 3
- Views
- 279
