Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Hmm, yes I would include that one too. Thats not a style of engraving I recognise as correct.
Why so?
I'd say the caseback is correct for (later) 113.603 references.
If it is correct for the IDF... most people don't know. There are like 50 different style of engravings out there...
And my guess is that 49 of them are fake... 😀
That is why due diligence is needed with the engravings. Coping military engravings accurately is not easy, fonts, sizes, depth of engraving and correct issue number consistent with age, etc.
Inconsistency in a Military engraving must be viewed with huge skepticism. I have photo records of both real and fake and this helps me a lot.
Well whether it is easy or not: a lot of people "pimp" their watches like that... And when I see another "unique" watch with a "very special" engraving - of course a "prototype" - for totally crazy prices on christies or philipps I am wondering...
How do you know what is real and what is fake for your photo gallery?