I’m about to buy a new watch

Posts

5

Likes

9

marcowip

·Jan 22, 2021

Hello mates!

I found this lovely constellation. Reference should be 168.010.
What dou you think? Should I buy it?

thank you!

 

Posts

1,172

Likes

4,959

apsm100

·Jan 22, 2021·Noob taxpayer

Terrible photos but: Refinished dial and wrong hands.
Run away!

 

Posts

2,761

Likes

4,359

lillatroll

·Jan 22, 2021

As above. Photos are probably terrible for a reason, even so, the redial is so bad you can spot it through the blur.

 

Posts

6,065

Likes

9,379

Peemacgee

·Jan 22, 2021·Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers

Lugs do look wide enough to be an .010 but that case back looks like an .004

 

Posts

606

Likes

785

Franco

·Jan 22, 2021

Apart for the previous observations, the presence of a steel back probably implies the case it is gold filled.

Which is rarely an attractive option , particularly in such a badly reprinted watch.

 

Posts

6,065

Likes

9,379

Peemacgee

·Jan 22, 2021·Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers

Franco

Apart for the previous observations, the presence of a steel back probably implies the case it is gold filled.

Which is rarely an attractive option , particularly in such a badly reprinted watch.

You are correct in suggesting that the OPs watch is not solid gold.
Constellations are gold-capped which, whilst not solid gold, is a very different animal to gold-filled.
If I'm not mistaken, this one looks to be rose-gold and they are very attractive and I have one myself (but with the correct pencil hands)

However, the issues with this watch would make it a strong pass for me.

 

Posts

5

Likes

9

marcowip

·Jan 22, 2021

Thank you all for your replies.
Now I understand the price… only 350€!

I think I should change the thread title 😀