I like this watch, would it be a good first Omega?

Posts
740
Likes
1,376
I guess that depends somewhat on how one defines "good," but the previous generation Railmasters are certainly fine watches, and they can be found today at quite attractive prices. So I'd say that there are three points in favor

1. OP likes it.
2. Good quality.
3. Reasonably priced (assuming the OP isn't paying more than the current market value).
 
Posts
1,970
Likes
2,130
I have a black one with the denim strap. It is an absolutely fantastic, wearable 3 hander watch. it isn't flashy, and it isn't bulky at all, so it is REALLY wearable as a result. Kind of a 'forget you are wearing it' level of comfort, which is a great benefit for a first watch.

The style is a bit divisive, but frankly, I love it. It gets less respect than it deserves. It has a great movement, and a very attractive case/dial. IMO, you could do MUCH MUCH worse.
 
Posts
76
Likes
215
I have the black dial version and have really liked it. Great movement and build quality obviously and excellent timekeeping. Very versatile. The styling seems to provoke different reactions from folks - maybe due to its simplicity or lack of applied indices etc. Some love it and some are more meh. I am in the former category. I’d say if you like the styling and get it at a good price (which should be doable), you will not be displeased.
 
Posts
2,473
Likes
3,855
If you like it, go for it. I've seen these preowned in great condition with box & papers in the low $2k range. For a Master Chronometer, that's a great value.
 
Posts
1,065
Likes
1,073
It's an excellent watch if you like the size and look. There is no doubt about that. The movement in it is just as good as any Seamaster or Planet Ocean or Aqua Terra being sold today.

What I would caution you against is buying it because the price is cheaper than other Omegas you prefer. Even an "inexpensive" Railmaster costs thousands of dollars (or whatever currency). But if you really like the look, it's an excellent watch.
 
Posts
8,608
Likes
71,131
And get both the strap and the bracelet - it’s generally cheaper in the long run to get them both when you get the watch
 
Posts
33
Likes
141
From my point of view absolutely yes! The Railmaster with the denim style dial is a fantastic choice for a first Omega. It’s fresh, casual, and has a very unique personality compared to the more common models.

Beyond the aesthetics, the technical side is where this watch truly shines. The Master Chronometer certification and the anti-magnetic movement specs really speak for themselves. It’s a powerhouse of a watch.

If you like how it looks, go for it without any doubts! It’s a reliable and stylish companion for a great start in the Omega world.

Such a cool piece to begin your collection!
 
Posts
89
Likes
237
Anyone wearing one of these would be a watch nerd so highly recommend!
 
Posts
1,850
Likes
2,805
I don’t dislike the watch, but I’ll play devil’s advocate here.

You haven’t given us anything to go on. Is it a good first Omega? Yes—insofar as you apparently don’t have an Omega, so it would be your first, and this is indeed an Omega that some people like.

But what are you looking for? A casual watch? One you’re going to wear with a suit? Something really classic that gets to the core of Omega as a brand? And what calls to you about this one?

If all you care about is owning a watch from a prestigious luxury brand that has a little Omega symbol on the dial, I’d probably suggest a preowned 90s Bond style diver or something. This is a pretty niche watch, and although several of its admirers have already responded, you should know (as others have hinted) that it’s a controversial design. If it’s selling cheap, well, there’s a reason for that. Yes it’s a lot of tech for the money, but you have to like how it looks on your wrist, and faux denim dial (on a denim style strap) is a bold look that many won’t like and that may not age well.

Give us a little more so we can make a more informed suggestion?
 
Posts
214
Likes
214
I don’t dislike the watch, but I’ll play devil’s advocate here.

You haven’t given us anything to go on. Is it a good first Omega? Yes—insofar as you apparently don’t have an Omega, so it would be your first, and this is indeed an Omega that some people like.

But what are you looking for? A casual watch? One you’re going to wear with a suit? Something really classic that gets to the core of Omega as a brand? And what calls to you about this one?

If all you care about is owning a watch from a prestigious luxury brand that has a little Omega symbol on the dial, I’d probably suggest a preowned 90s Bond style diver or something. This is a pretty niche watch, and although several of its admirers have already responded, you should know (as others have hinted) that it’s a controversial design. If it’s selling cheap, well, there’s a reason for that. Yes it’s a lot of tech for the money, but you have to like how it looks on your wrist, and faux denim dial (on a denim style strap) is a bold look that many won’t like and that may not age well.

Give us a little more so we can make a more informed suggestion?
The double denim is a great look. And one that I'm happy for other people, particularly Canadians, to wear.

I'd want it on a bracelet, which will probably impact the price.
 
Posts
2,965
Likes
8,696
Another plus is that it looks sporty and informal, not flashy and expensive. That means you can wear it without fear of being robbed.

Best of all it do NOT look like a Rolex.

( I`m still tying to get the award for Most OmegaForumiest Reply of the Year) 😉
 
Posts
160
Likes
258
Try on a few that are in (or almost in) your price range.

If this one is still your favourite, then yes.
 
Posts
1,953
Likes
5,904
I own the black dial variant as well as the '57 version...

speaking to my own experiences with the 40mm version:
great dial with a caveat ~ it's not actually black but transitions from black to a steely brownish. So I would guess the blue dial doesn't stay blue/denim either depending on how the light hits it.
Not a fan of the bracelet, a butterfly clasp seems too formal for what is arguably a "tool/engineer" watch. I prefer it either on a strap or US flatlink bracelet.
Fabulous lume.
Nitpicking ~ wish the crown was more traditional shaped (vs muffin shaped) - and - the case it too damn thick.
 
Posts
238
Likes
301
A Railmaster is a solid first choice, though I'd opt for getting in on a bracelet or leather for more versatility, preferably bracelet as that will be least costly if you decide to add other wearing options later down the line.
 
Posts
76
Likes
215
I own the black dial variant as well as the '57 version...

speaking to my own experiences with the 40mm version:
great dial with a caveat ~ it's not actually black but transitions from black to a steely brownish. So I would guess the blue dial doesn't stay blue/denim either depending on how the light hits it.
Not a fan of the bracelet, a butterfly clasp seems too formal for what is arguably a "tool/engineer" watch. I prefer it either on a strap or US flatlink bracelet.
Fabulous lume.
Nitpicking ~ wish the crown was more traditional shaped (vs muffin shaped) - and - the case it too damn thick.
Yeah not sure if your concern is how the crown looks or operates, but I am not a huge fan of the crown interaction. Not bad but not great. Agree with your comment on the bracelet as well - fine but just okay overall to me. Still love the watch though.
 
Posts
10,734
Likes
52,653
I have one really like it. I have the bracelet but put it on a blue sued strap. It’s honestly one of my favorites really nice watch. The way the light hits the dial and gives it a different look is exactly what I look for.
Edited: