Scarecrow Boat
··Burt Macklin, FBIWhoosh, straight over my head!
Whoosh, straight over my head!
I have been trying to ignore this discussion, but the Fratello article so nicely encapsulated my own views on the Rolex phenomenon that I feel compelled to add my own perspective.
I have owned several DateJusts over the years and there is still a nice one sitting amongst my Omegas, so I am not anti Rolex at all. Several years ago I had a couple of early Constellations but needed to make some decisions about where I wanted my collecting to go in the future.
It was brought to a head by a very nice twenty year old Rolex Submariner full set. The price was just below that of a new one from ADs in the city, but of course new ones were unavailable - and I had no desire to pay thousands more on the grey market.
I left it, and decided to focus on acquiring more Constellations from the late fifties and sixties in the best condition I could afford. I wanted a set that were sufficiently different from each other to ensure it kept my interest in all of them.
So, for the price I would have paid for that single Submariner, I subsequently acquired six more Constellations that included two pie pans, two 18k golds, two gold capped and two steel, two with original Omega metal bands, and a mix of no-date, date, and day-date movements. Here they are:
I enjoy each one of them and I enjoy them as a representative set. Would I exchange them for one Rolex Submariner? No way.
I offer this perspective to those new to the Forum as a possible balance to the Rolex obsession that can so easily afflict new collectors.
Compared to the Constellation collections others on this Forum have displayed, I know that this is only a start for a serious collector, but it will probably suffice. Unless of course I see something else that could not be ignored......
I have been trying to ignore this discussion, but the Fratello article so nicely encapsulated my own views on the Rolex phenomenon that I feel compelled to add my own perspective.
I have owned several DateJusts over the years and there is still a nice one sitting amongst my Omegas, so I am not anti Rolex at all. Several years ago I had a couple of early Constellations but needed to make some decisions about where I wanted my collecting to go in the future.
It was brought to a head by a very nice twenty year old Rolex Submariner full set. The price was just below that of a new one from ADs in the city, but of course new ones were unavailable - and I had no desire to pay thousands more on the grey market.
I left it, and decided to focus on acquiring more Constellations from the late fifties and sixties in the best condition I could afford. I wanted a set that were sufficiently different from each other to ensure it kept my interest in all of them.
So, for the price I would have paid for that single Submariner, I subsequently acquired six more Constellations that included two pie pans, two 18k golds, two gold capped and two steel, three with original Omega metal bands, and a mix of no-date, date, and day-date movements. Here they are:
I enjoy each one of them and I enjoy them as a representative set. Would I exchange them for one Rolex Submariner? No way.
I offer this perspective to those new to the Forum as a possible balance to the Rolex obsession that can so easily afflict new collectors.
Compared to the Constellation collections others on this Forum have displayed, I know that this is only a start for a serious collector, but it will probably suffice. Unless of course I see something else that could not be ignored......
This thread! Lol. Alls I know is I should have kept my submariner. Now they're out of my reach
That article explains almost exactly why I do not like Rolex. Maybe it's all very good that people want a Rolex "because Rolex". But that is selling a lifestyle, not a watch. Harley Davidson did the same in the early 2000s. People wrote books about the marketing genius of Harley, and now look where they are.
Harley Davidson is struggling largely as a result of its baby-boomer customer base ageing out of riding and not enough young people have embraced the big cruiser and touring bikes. Not the case with Rolex. I highly doubt Rolex will experience what is going on with the Bar and Shield.
What do you mean? The same exact thing is going on with mechanical watches. Have you not noticed the average age of the posters here?
But that is selling a lifestyle,
S ShayHas anyone got experience with getting the coloured OP? I meant in terms of waiting time?