)
You do have the genuinely incredible advantage of being able to fix it yourself if you bump it too hard on the BMW emblem 😉
This thread is woefully lacking in pictures and humor. Here is a Rolex from when you could walk into a dealer and have your pick
And let’s not forget about the flat champagne and flattery.
On a separate thread, I see that Omega's behaviour with regards to the new Snoopy couldn't be more different. No playing games etc, just first come first served as long as you can pay for it.
I think you need to re-read some of those threads. The word is going out that sometimes people are getting bumped in line by VVIPs who want Snoopy watches. Or that you were #3 at your OB for one, and now you're #4 because "Mr. Three-per-Year" wants one.
No worries. I'll have another look. One of those threads is 165 pages long and I'm still working my way through it!
I think you need to re-read some of those threads. The word is going out that sometimes people are getting bumped in line by VVIPs who want Snoopy watches. Or that you were #3 at your OB for one, and now you're #4 because "Mr. Three-per-Year" wants one.
I hear ya! I read SOME of that stuff. But it sure looks like Omega is pulling some shenanigans. Not as bad as Rolex, but they don't exactly have clean hands here. They've said that everyone who wants one will have a chance to buy one, but who knows. They might change their minds in a year.
This thread is like watching 9 seasons of the curse of oak island
Thank you, you've made some very good points here! I´d like to add that one thing keeping Rolex´s brand identity and value very strong, I think, is the fact that they haven't fallen into the trap of making endless (and imho mostly superfluous) "limited editions" of this watch or another, like Omega and Seiko do, all for a quick buck and very tiresome! Rolex has never operated this way. Cheers!
This thread is like watching 9 seasons of the curse of oak island
If you suggest the Knights Templar are behind the SS “craze/shortage,” you’ll get some takers
Ok, so this is a plaintiff lawyer’s persuasive interpretation of CDP’s policies, used to completely extrapolate an interpretation of Rolex’s policies (the latter of which the plaintiff’s lawyer hasn’t actually seen)
