jankymutt
·Without claiming to know anything about Rolex's business, as a former bean counter I can say the term "constraining production" is an amorphous term. Does it mean not adding a shift or not investing in more plant? If they are at or near full capacity of their existing plant and staff they are not constraining production even if they don't expand.
Some of you might remember the "Cabbage Patch" doll phenomenon of 30 years ago. There was huge demand, re-sellers were getting way more than retail. Coleco invested on increasing production facilities for dolls at a time their cash flow was short due to video game investments. The bubble burst and Coleco suffered bankruptcy. Of course iconic brands like Rolex shouldn't be as volatile as a toy but the same principle applies.
IMHO Rolex knows their business. They are doing something right. Being treated as a charity can't be too bad either.
I am in medicine, not finance, so my knowledge is limited, but your argument makes sense. Constraining product would result in significant changes to their business (laying off workers, shutting down machines, decreasing orders for raw materials). Trying to reverse all of that in the future would be difficult. My gut feeling is that the world economy has been rebounding from the 2008 recession. Western countries have a lot of rich people getting richer and emerging countries have a lot of new rich people. I think the prices will stay high until there is another global correction/recession.