Forums Latest Members
  1. Gui13250 Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    452
    Likes
    704
    Hi there!
    After owning my first vintage watch, which was a 168.005 PiePan, I’ve decided that it was too polished to be a keeper... so I’ve sold it, thought I wanted a 1601... but found a nice exemple and pulled the trigger on it :)

    Here is the new one which I think is sharp enough! It is from January 1964 according the Extract


    47258C98-1A39-492C-9F11-1795439E9122.jpeg 1622F36C-8899-471C-9741-876327E32852.jpeg
     
  2. Skipper_S Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    374
    Likes
    501
    Nice!!! Share your previous 168.005 if possible :)
     
    Stripey likes this.
  3. killer67 Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    1,443
    Likes
    2,425
    Very nice example
     
  4. Gui13250 Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    452
    Likes
    704
    Here is the previous one, nice dial and crosshairs, but definitely less sharp!
    ABD9A71F-AF34-405F-9ECB-80A7CBE39881.png
     
  5. SurvivingJoe Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    222
    Likes
    629
    Dispite of the polish, I appreciate the crosshairs more.
     
  6. Noddyman Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    1,116
    Likes
    1,774
    Good move, your latest one is much nicer.
     
  7. TimeODanaos Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    1,566
    Likes
    3,221
    This may be utter OF heresy, but I think crosshairs can be over-rated, making a busy dial just a bit too much... Is it just me?
     
  8. hejsam Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    2,045
    Likes
    14,817
    Personal opinion but I think the crosshair adds it all up to an overall better dial. Without the crosshair I always find the dial is missing something!
    1FCDFF2F-21A1-4D2C-9DB9-CA4B0592269A.jpeg 5DEFEEB1-793A-4D94-B1BB-4887872076F7.jpeg

    Congrats on your new 168.005, the case is way better than your previous! :)
     
  9. Gui13250 Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    452
    Likes
    704
    Cross hair is definitely a nice feature, I really appreciate it.
    But between a polished one with cross hair or a sharper one without, I’ve made my choice :)
     
    BlackTalon and TimeODanaos like this.
  10. joe band Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    398
    i think the 167.005 and 168.005 are the epitome of timeless style. congrats!
     
    Gui13250 likes this.
  11. joe band Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    398
    drooling....
     
    hejsam likes this.
  12. gbesq Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    7,821
    Likes
    39,911
    It’s first cousin, my 1964 167.005, says hi!
    427BB38B-8A3D-4194-8D7A-C59852C5B130.jpeg
     
  13. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    Is there a small hour marker next to date window?
     
  14. Gui13250 Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    452
    Likes
    704
    Nope, just a dot of lume
     
  15. Robbyman Jun 16, 2020

    Posts
    178
    Likes
    292
    Mine says hello to.
     
    A9537F4D-36B3-4266-B5E2-8D4CA1DF7E83.jpeg
  16. pdxleaf ... Jun 17, 2020

    Posts
    4,287
    Likes
    14,397
    These really are stunning. I confess to not paying much attention to them before. The bracelet is classy and looks comfortable. The octagon (?) Crown is different and a nice feature. The broad hands have that vintage touch and of course the dial. I am also a Hamilton fan and the dial has a Hamilton quality. (Hope that isn't offensive to some as it's meant to be a compliment. )

    I want one now. Thanks for sharing.
     
    Sherbie and Gui13250 like this.
  17. gbesq Jun 17, 2020

    Posts
    7,821
    Likes
    39,911
    They are both classics. The 168.005’s are easier to find in good original condition. Good quality examples of the 167.005 seem to be getting more elusive.
     
  18. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Jun 17, 2020

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    Decagon
     
    Samir likes this.
  19. killer67 Jun 17, 2020

    Posts
    1,443
    Likes
    2,425
    Despite the crosshair missing, a worthwhile upgrade and has a bracelet to boot
     
    Samir and Gui13250 like this.
  20. Gui13250 Jul 2, 2020

    Posts
    452
    Likes
    704
    Hi all!
    I’ve just noticed that there is something like a washer on the crown tube, between crown and case.
    I think a did not have it on the previous, any idea of what is it?

    sorry for the poor quality picture... not easy to macro shot :)

    D6380A4B-2737-4F6E-9112-8999165977C2.png Hi all!