JwRosenthal
·I'd trust an Archer or STS as much as I'd trust a Watchco but that is just me.
I'd trust an Archer or STS as much as I'd trust a Watchco but that is just me.
I understand that watchco said their watches were serviced, but the receipt I have just notes the sale of the watch and not any details on the service done to the movement.
I assume Omega would service a Watchco or otherwise built watch, which would mean it's real enough?
I would actually assume the opposite. Why would they service a watch that they neither sold, nor assembled?
Agreed, provided that there's a way to distinguish between a WatchCo built watch and a factory built watch. However, the consensus here is that a WatchCo watch is made up of all Omega service parts and indistinguishable from a factory built or previously serviced watch
I have zero expertise on the topic, but surely Omega would have records of the matching case and movement numbers that left the factory in fully assembled watches, no?
It will be interesting to see how Omega would handle one of these coming in for service (anyone have experience sending one back to the factory?). I don’t think they will fuss actually; these watches are made with factory parts that had to be obtained by an authorized parts account holder (at the time), using older Omega movements. Watchco didn’t violate any rules as far as I know- Omega changed their policies after they realized what watchco was doing (which is no different than what Ofrei or Cousins was doing other than watchco was assembling whole watches and not just selling the parts). Regardless of who assembled them, they are genuine Omegas. Now if someone sent in one of the Etsy/eBay fake kit 300’s with an old 552/565 in it, then they would be within their right to send it back, fake is fake.
I assume Omega would service a Watchco or otherwise built watch, which would mean it's real enough?
I also find it a bit odd that you assert that they are "genuine Omegas", as by that dubious standard, so would a watch that was assembled from parts stripped from disparate donor watches. I mean yes, in a loose sense, if all the parts are "correct" for the model, then the watch would be "genuine".
As long as the parts are authentic, why would you care who assembled it?
I guess it's some kind of perverse sense of authenticity, and more so provenance.. Also taking some comfort in they seem to know what they were doing; and doing it very well by all accounts, rather than any Tom Dick or Harry I've never heard of..
Apart from Hanks, Cavett and Dirty, that is to say 😉
By the sounds of it, it's another minefield
but I guess as long as it's been put together with genuine parts, by an appropriate adult (professional watchmaker),
then I have no qualms about it being non-WatchCo, although it does seem as if the WatchCo moniker is used as a euphemism to describe this kind of watch that's been put together outside of the factory..
It also seems that a WatchCo 'provenance' is more desirable and seems to command a bit of a premium in terms of price over others..
It also seems that a WatchCo 'provenance' is more desirable and seems to command a bit of a premium in terms of price over others..