How has your taste in watches changed?

Posts
668
Likes
2,700
I had a moment of reflection today about my watch collecting journey, and figured I'd start this threat to share and hear our evolution in watch preferences.

When I was a poor student, my quartz designer brands and Bulovas really made me feel like I was wearing some fine pieces (a couple Swiss made, which meant nothing to me at the time). As I escalated the arduous latter of success, I eventually entered the luxury watch club with my criteria initially being:

Any watch I bought had to be quartz (I was irrationally afraid of getting an automatic watch for whatever reason).
When it came to tool watches, they had to have a steel bezel.
All my watches had to have a metal bracelet.
Case size was never a consideration.
I would go out of my way to find models with a butterfly clasp.
As time went by, my watches had to have applied logos and markers.
As more time went by, I wasn't satisfied with any watch that wasn't Omega.

Fast forward to today, and I've found that:
I can't stand watching a ticking seconds hand (I still own a few quartz, but mostly Bulova UHFs with a smooth sweep).
Ceramic bezels are really cool (especially with liquidmetal); removing scratches from steel bezels is a PITA.
Rubber and leather straps are very comfortable and can really reinvent a watch (although I still hate pin buckles).
I can't wear anything under 39mm (43mm for tool watches).
Quick adjust fold-over clasps are super cool, as well as deployment clasps.
There are features more important that applied logos.
Diamonds look tacky - especially fake ones.
There are watches that are not Omega that I truly enjoy.
I still haven't acquired a taste for NATO straps.

Funny things to think about, but thought it would be fun to share. What has your evolution in watch tastes been?
 
Posts
805
Likes
2,218
I think everyone is humbled by their own presumptions eventually. But we all learn and refine as we go along. To me there have been a few pinnacle designs that I had obsessed about forever: Rolex 1016, IWC Mark IX, Tudor Ranger that all fit within my sensibility. But as time and the tide change, there at new corners of collecting they we find and that is fun as well. Also I am rediscovering watches I bought years ago. 20 years ago I wore a sinn 656 as my only watch for at least 6 years as a diehard tool watch person. I would have never thought I’d wear a datejust regularly in the future, but guess what? A datejust is also a tool watch!

 
Posts
2,884
Likes
14,753
I've been completely schizophrenic and wildly inconsistent in my tastes. I've swung from vintage to modern and back to vintage and back to modern, gone from simple manual time-only watches, to watches with some complications, from straps to bracelets. All I can say about my tastes in watches is that my taste is highly variable depending on season!
 
Posts
616
Likes
928
I am always and still attracted by vintage watches (I like under 36mm dress watches, and 39mm chronographs). Actually, my taste evolved about the material : the gold was a no way for me but since 2-3 years I really became interested and ready to get one!
On modern watches, still zero interest except independent watchmakers that I definitely can't afford (Dufour, Petermann-Bedat, Akrivia, Journe, etc.).
 
Posts
2,519
Likes
3,557
For a time I was obsessed with the Seiko Belmatics, now I hardly wear any of the dozen I have.
 
Posts
668
Likes
2,700
For a time I was obsessed with the Seiko Belmatics, now I hardly wear any of the dozen I have.
Now that's really going back!
 
Posts
1,018
Likes
1,795
I used to like 2-tone gold/steel or gold/titanium. Now, not so much.
 
Posts
668
Likes
2,700
I used to like 2-tone gold/steel or gold/titanium. Now, not so much.

Yup, this is another one I've walked back from quite a distance.